Detection of small differences in mass using a direct digital dental X-ray system

被引:7
作者
Chen, SK [1 ]
Hollender, L [1 ]
Omnell, KA [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL TAIWAN UNIV,DIV ORAL RADIOL,SCH DENT,TAIPEI 10764,TAIWAN
关键词
radiography; dental; radiographic image enhancement;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600202
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate experimentally how in direct digital radiography heterogenous detector response may influence the depiction of small mass differences. Methods: A step wedge of a bone-simulating resin was imaged at 70 kVp using Radio-VisioGraphy ZHR 32000. Exposure time and step wedge position on the detector varied. The pixel values of the stored images of the step wedge were converted to luminance values of the displayed images. Results: The relationship between pixel and luminance values was non-linear. The difference in luminance between adjacent steps varied with position of step wedge. Regardless of position, there was an increase in difference of luminance between steps with increasing exposure. A greater relative change in luminance was consequently seen in the thinner parts of the step wedge. The failure to perceive individual steps of the wedge in its thicker parts was related to insufficient relative change in luminance between steps. Conclusions: The heterogeneous response of the detector resulted in a varying ability to depict small mass changes over the detector area.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 66
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF THE NEW RADIOVISIOGRAPHY SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY [J].
BENZ, C ;
MOUYEN, F .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1991, 72 (05) :627-631
[2]   DETECTOR RESPONSE AND EXPOSURE CONTROL OF THE RADIO VISIOGRAPHY SYSTEM (RVG 32000 ZHR) [J].
CHEN, SK ;
HOLLENDER, L ;
ODONT, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1993, 76 (01) :104-111
[3]  
Dove S B, 1992, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V21, P127
[4]   DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF PERIODONTAL BONE-LESIONS [J].
FURKART, AJ ;
DOVE, SB ;
MCDAVID, WD ;
NUMMIKOSKI, P ;
MATTESON, S .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1992, 74 (05) :652-660
[5]   QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF DIGITAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPH IMAGING-SYSTEMS [J].
HILDEBOLT, CF ;
VANNIER, MW ;
PILGRAM, TK ;
SHROUT, MK .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1990, 70 (05) :661-668
[6]   DETERMINATION OF SMALL MASS DIFFERENCES IN ROENTGENOGRAPHY .2. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS WITH A ROENTGEN DIFFRACTION APPARATUS [J].
HOLLENDER, L ;
LYSELL, G .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-THERAPY PHYSICS BIOLOGY, 1972, 11 (02) :145-+
[7]   RADIOVISIOGRAPHY - AN INITIAL EVALUATION [J].
HORNER, K ;
SHEARER, AC ;
WALKER, A ;
WILSON, NHF .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1990, 168 (06) :244-248
[8]  
KUNDEL HL, 1986, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V24, P69
[9]   DETERMINATION OF SMALL MASS DIFFERENCES IN ROENTGENOGRAPHY .I. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
LYSELL, G ;
MARTENSSON, BK ;
OMNELL, KA .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-THERAPY PHYSICS BIOLOGY, 1968, 7 (01) :42-+
[10]   PRESENTATION AND PHYSICAL EVALUATION OF RADIO VISIOGRAPHY [J].
MOUYEN, F ;
BENZ, C ;
SONNABEND, E ;
LODTER, JP .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1989, 68 (02) :238-242