Proliferation accurately identifies the high-risk patients among small, low-grade, lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers

被引:23
作者
Baak, J. P. A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
van Diest, P. J. [1 ]
Janssen, E. A. M. [3 ]
Gudlaugsson, E. [3 ]
Voorhorst, F. J. [1 ,2 ]
van der Wall, E. [5 ]
Vermorken, J. B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
[4] Univ Bergen, Gade Inst, Bergen, Norway
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
breast cancer; mitotic index; prognosis; proliferation; small tumours; well-differentiated cancers;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdm535
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The proliferation factor mitotic activity index (MAI) is the strongest prognosticator in lymph node-negative invasive breast cancer patients under age 71. The question remains, whether this also holds for 'favourable prognosis' subgroups. Patients and methods: The study was a multicentre prospective analysis of the MAI for recurrence-free survival and overall cancer-related survival of grade, MAI, and other prognosticators in 853 long-term follow-up, T1-3N0M0 breast cancer patients under 71 years. Results: In all tumours together (N = 853), in grade 3 (n = 269), in tumours < 1 cm all grades (n = 84), 1-2 cm, grades 1 + 2 (n = 300), and 2-3 cm, grades 1 + 2 (n = 124), the MAI is prognostically superior. Other features [grade, estrogen receptor (ER), diameter, and age] did not enhance its prognostic value except in grades 1 + 2 tumours 2-3 cm diameter with MAI < 10, where ER has an additional prognostic value. Conclusions: In women < 71 years with T1-3N0M0 small or low-grade invasive breast cancer usually not receiving systemic treatment, MAI >= 10 accurately identifies those at high risk. These high-risk patients should be considered for adjuvant systemic therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 654
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating breast cancer: A randomized multicenter study [J].
Amadori, D ;
Nanni, O ;
Marangolo, M ;
Pacini, P ;
Ravaioli, A ;
Rossi, A ;
Gambi, A ;
Catalano, G ;
Perroni, D ;
Scarpi, E ;
Giunchi, DC ;
Tienghi, A ;
Becciolini, A ;
Volpi, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (17) :3125-3134
[3]   Mitotic index and benefit of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer [J].
Andre, F ;
Khalil, A ;
Slimane, K ;
Massard, C ;
Mathieu, MC ;
Vignot, S ;
Assi, H ;
Delaloge, S ;
Spielmann, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (13) :2996-3000
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, HIST TYP BREAST TUM
[5]   The prognostic value of proliferation in lymph-node-negative breast cancer patients is age dependent [J].
Baak, Jan P. A. ;
van Diest, Paul J. ;
Voorhorst, Feja J. ;
van der Wall, Elsken ;
Beex, Louk V. A. M. ;
Vermorken, Jan B. ;
Janssen, Emiel A. M. ;
Gudlaugsson, Einar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (03) :527-535
[6]   Prospective multicenter validation of the independent prognostic value of the mitotic activity index in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients younger than 55 years [J].
Baak, JPA ;
van Diest, PJ ;
Voorhorst, FJ ;
van der Wall, E ;
Beex, LVM ;
Vermorken, JB ;
Janssen, EAM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (25) :5993-6001
[7]  
BAAK JPA, 1985, CANCER, V56, P374, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<374::AID-CNCR2820560229>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-9
[9]   The framework of pathology: Good Laboratory Practice by quantitative and molecular methods [J].
Baak, JPA .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2002, 198 (03) :277-283
[10]   THE MULTICENTER MORPHOMETRIC MAMMARY-CARCINOMA PROJECT (MMMCP) - A NATIONWIDE PROSPECTIVE-STUDY ON REPRODUCIBILITY AND PROGNOSTIC POWER OF ROUTINE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS IN THE NETHERLANDS [J].
BAAK, JPA ;
VANDIEST, PJ ;
ARIENS, AT ;
VANBEEK, MWPM ;
BELLOT, SM ;
FIJNHEER, J ;
VANGORP, LHM ;
KWEE, WS ;
LOS, J ;
PETERSE, HC ;
RUITENBERG, HM ;
SCHAPERS, RFM ;
SCHIPPER, MEI ;
SOMSEN, JG .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1989, 185 (05) :664-670