Impact of drug levels and baseline genotype and phenotype on the virologic response to amprenavir/ritonavir-based salvage regimens

被引:11
作者
Valer, L
De Requena, DG
De Mendoza, C
Martin-Carbonero, L
González-Lahoz, J
Soriano, V
机构
[1] Hosp Carlos III, Infect Dis Serv, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Carlos III, Serv Pharm, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1089/108729104322740857
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Coadministration of amprenavir (APV) with small doses of ritonavir. (RTV) results in a significant increase in APV plasma concentrations. Viruses showing resistance to other protease inhibitors (PI) may remain susceptible to APV, supporting a role for this drug in salvage therapy. We enrolled 35 patients who began a rescue intervention based on APV/RTV 600/100 mg twice daily. Their median viral load before beginning APV/RTV was 4.15 logs and their median CD4 count was 247 cells per microliter. The median prior PI exposure was of 43 months. At baseline, the median number of PI resistance mutations was 7. A significant virologic response (VR) (>1 log drop in plasma HIV-RNA and/or to <50 copies per milliliter) was recorded in 21.7% (5/23) of treated patients at week 48 (14.3% in the intent-to-treat analysis). The VR was significantly more frequent among subjects with less than 5 PI resistance mutations (66.6% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.008). Patients with prior exposure to lopinavir showed VR significantly less frequently than those not exposed to that drug (11% versus 60%; p < 0.05). The mean APV plasma trough concentration at week 12 was 1.3 mug/mL, and did not differ significantly comparing subjects having or not having VR. A trend toward a higher VR rate at week 48 was noticed among subjects with high genotypic inhibitory quotients (GIQ). In summary, HIV genotyping but not drug levels might be helpful to predict which patients would benefit from a rescue intervention based on APV/RTV 600/100 twice daily.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Arvieux Cedric, 2002, HIV Clin Trials, V3, P125
  • [2] Comparison of the efficacy, safety and predictive value of HIV genotyping using distinct ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors
    Barreiro, P
    Camino, N
    de Mendoza, C
    Valer, L
    Núñez, M
    Martín-Carbonero, L
    González-Lahoz, J
    Soriano, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2002, 20 (06) : 438 - 443
  • [3] A randomized study of antiretroviral management based on plasma genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in patients failing therapy
    Baxter, JD
    Mayers, DL
    Wentworth, DN
    Neaton, JD
    Hoover, ML
    Winters, MA
    Mannheimer, SB
    Thompson, MA
    Abrams, DI
    Brizz, BJ
    Ioannidis, JPA
    Merigan, TC
    [J]. AIDS, 2000, 14 (09) : F83 - F93
  • [4] BRUN S, 2001, 8 C RETR OPP INF SEA
  • [5] de Mendoza Carmen, 2002, HIV Clin Trials, V3, P304
  • [6] DEREQUENA DG, 2000, AIDS REV, V2, P67
  • [7] Amprenavir inhibitory quotient and virological response in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients on an amprenavir-containing salvage regimen without or with ritonavir
    Duval, X
    Lamotte, C
    Race, E
    Descamps, D
    Damond, F
    Clavel, F
    Leport, C
    Peytavin, G
    Vilde, JL
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (02) : 570 - 574
  • [8] ELSTON R, 2001, ANTIVIR THER S, V6, P53
  • [9] GALLEGO O, 2003, ANTIVIR THER S, V9, P113
  • [10] Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1:: 2003 recommendations of an international AIDS Society-USA panel
    Hirsch, MS
    Brun-Vézinet, F
    Clotet, B
    Conway, B
    Kuritzkes, DR
    D'Aquila, RT
    Demeter, LM
    Hammer, SM
    Johnson, VA
    Loveday, C
    Mellors, JW
    Jacobsen, DM
    Richman, DD
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 37 (01) : 113 - 128