Impact cratering theory and modeling for the Deep Impact mission: From mission planning to data analysis

被引:36
作者
Richardson, JE [1 ]
Melosh, HJ
Artemeiva, NA
Pierazzo, E
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Inst Dynam Geospheres, Moscow, Russia
[3] Planetary Sci Inst, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
impact cratering; theory; modeling; experiments; comets; structure; composition; space missions; Deep Impact spacecraft design;
D O I
10.1007/s11214-005-3393-5
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The cratering event produced by the Deep Impact mission is a unique experimental opportunity, beyond the capability of Earth-based laboratories with regard to the impacting energy, target material, space environment, and extremely low-gravity field. Consequently, impact cratering theory and modeling play an important role in this mission, from initial inception to final data analysis. Experimentally derived impact cratering scaling laws provide us with our best estimates for the crater diameter, depth, and formation time: critical in the mission planning stage for producing the flight plan and instrument specifications. Cratering theory has strongly influenced the impactor design, producing a probe that should produce the largest possible crater on the surface of Tempel 1 under a wide range of scenarios. Numerical hydrocode modeling allows us to estimate the volume and thermodynamic characteristics of the material vaporized in the early stages of the impact. Hydrocode modeling will also aid us in understanding the observed crater excavation process, especially in the area of impacts into porous materials. Finally, experimentally derived ejecta scaling laws and modeling provide us with a means to predict and analyze the observed behavior of the material launched from the comet during crater excavation, and may provide us with a unique means of estimating the magnitude of the comet's gravity field and by extension the mass and density of comet Tempel 1.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 267
页数:27
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Anderson CE, 1987, INT J IMPACT ENG, V5, P33, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0734-743X(87)90029-7), 10.1016/0734-743X(87)90029-7, DOI 10.1016/0734-743X(87)90029-7]
[2]   Asymmetry of ejecta flow during oblique impacts using three-dimensional particle image velocimetry [J].
Anderson, JLB ;
Schultz, PH ;
Heineck, JT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2003, 108 (E8)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, OXFORD MONOGRAPHS GE
[4]  
ARTEMIEVA NA, 2001, LUN PLAN I C ABST, V32, P1431
[5]   DENSITY OF COMET SHOEMAKER-LEVY-9 DEDUCED BY MODELING BREAKUP OF THE PARENT RUBBLE-PILE [J].
ASPHAUG, E ;
BENZ, W .
NATURE, 1994, 370 (6485) :120-124
[6]  
Brandt J. C., 2004, Introduction to Comets
[7]   Surface of young Jupiter family comet 81 P/Wild 2: View from the Stardust spacecraft [J].
Brownlee, DE ;
Horz, F ;
Newburn, RL ;
Zolensky, M ;
Duxbury, TC ;
Sandford, S ;
Sekanina, Z ;
Tsou, P ;
Hanner, MS ;
Clark, BC ;
Green, SF ;
Kissel, J .
SCIENCE, 2004, 304 (5678) :1764-1769
[8]  
Chamberlain J. W., 1987, Theory of Planetary Atmospheres
[9]   Ejection-velocity distributions from impacts into coarse-grained sand [J].
Cintala, MJ ;
Berthoud, L ;
Hörz, F .
METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE, 1999, 34 (04) :605-623
[10]   Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations [J].
Collins, GS ;
Melosh, HJ ;
Ivanov, BA .
METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2004, 39 (02) :217-231