Results of a clinical care pathway for radical prostatectomy patients in an open hospital-multiphysician system

被引:23
作者
Gheiler, EL
Lovisolo, JAJ
Tiguert, R
Tefilli, MV
Grayson, T
Oldford, G
Powell, IJ
Famiglietti, G
Banerjee, M
Pontes, JE
Wood, DP
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; cost; complications;
D O I
10.1159/000019848
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The object of this study was to evaluate the results of a comprehensive clinical care pathway (CCP) aimed at reducing the length of hospitalization and overall cost for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in a setting including both academic and private physicians. Methods:The clinical records of 1,129 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy by 24 urologists between July 1, 1990, and December 31, 1996, were reviewed. The factors considered were length of stay, morbidity and mortality, readmission rates, and average cost, The CCP was implemented on January 1, 1994. Its scope was to minimize preoperative evaluation, eliminate the preoperative hospital stay, standardize postoperative care and provide intensive patient education. Results: The average length of stay decreased significantly after implementation of the CCP (8.1 vs. 4.9 days, p = 0.0001). In 1990, there was a large difference in length of stay between academic and private physicians (8.3 vs. 12.6 days) (p = 0.02) but by 1 year after implementation of the CCP there was virtually no difference (4.69 vs. 4.71 days) (p > 0.05). Complication rates were similar before and after implementation of the CCP. Using the average 1993 cost/case as the baseline preCCP figure, the average cost of radical prostatectomy decreased by 16% in 1994 and by 22% in 1995. Conclusions: It is possible to successfully implement a CCP in a multi-physician system to reduce length of stay and cost of radical prostatectomy without subjecting the patient to a greater risk of complication.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 216
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF CONTEMPORARY ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
ANDRIOLE, GL ;
SMITH, DS ;
RAO, G ;
GOODNOUGH, L ;
CATALONA, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1858-1860
[2]   CANCER STATISTICS, 1994 [J].
BORING, CC ;
SQUIRES, TS ;
TONG, T ;
MONTGOMERY, S .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1994, 44 (01) :7-26
[3]   Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Dillioglugil, O ;
Leibman, BD ;
Leibman, NS ;
Kattan, MW ;
Rosas, AL ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) :1760-1767
[4]   RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY - MORBIDITY AND URINARY CONTINENCE IN 418 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
HAUTMANN, RE ;
SAUTER, TW ;
WENDEROTH, UK .
UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (02) :47-51
[5]   PERIOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FROM BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY AND RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
IGEL, TC ;
BARRETT, DM ;
SEGURA, JW ;
BENSON, RC ;
RIFE, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (06) :1189-1191
[6]   Maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction with radical prostatectomy in the era of cost containment [J].
Klein, EA ;
Grass, JA ;
Calabrese, DA ;
Kay, RA ;
Sargeant, W ;
OHara, JF .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (02) :269-276
[7]   IMPACT OF PHYSICIAN AWARENESS ON HOSPITAL CHARGES FOR RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
KRAMOLOWSKY, EV ;
WOOD, NL ;
ROLLINS, KL ;
GLASHEEN, WP ;
NELSON, CMK .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) :139-142
[8]   EARLY HOSPITAL DISCHARGE AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY - IMPACT ON COST AND COMPLICATION RATE [J].
LICHT, MR ;
KLEIN, EA .
UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (05) :700-704
[9]   Cost-efficient radical prostatectomy with a clinical care path [J].
Litwin, MS ;
Smith, RB ;
Thind, A ;
Reccius, N ;
BlancoYarosh, M ;
deKernion, JB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (03) :989-993
[10]   AN ASSESSMENT OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - TIME TRENDS, GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION, AND OUTCOMES [J].
LUYAO, GL ;
MCLERRAN, D ;
WASSON, J ;
WENNBERG, JE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (20) :2633-2636