Diversity relationships among taxonomic groups in recovering and restored forests

被引:44
作者
Anand, M [1 ]
Laurence, S [1 ]
Rayfield, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Laurentian Univ, Dept Biol, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
关键词
biodiversity; bryophytes; correspondence analysis; Great Lakes-St. Lawrence; lichens; pollution; surrogate species; vascular plants;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00571.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Our objective was to reexamine the definition and use of surrogates in biodiversity studies of disturbed ecological communities. To this end, we examined diversity and community structure in recovering (pollution damaged) and restored (via lining, fertilizing, seeding, and planting) forests in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence zone near Sudbury Ontario, Canada. The relationships among taxonomic groups were determined using correlations between Shannon diversity and species richness. We used correspondence analysis to quantify the contribution, of taxonomic groups to diversity and community structure. We detected useful surrogates in the naturally recovering forests but not in restored forests. In the former, vascular plant diversity was significantly correlated with nonvascular plant diversity and reflected community structure in the total plant community Our results suggest that it may be important to restore and conserve diversity relationships rather than simply diversify levels because the relationships may be better indicators of ecosystem health or function.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 962
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Characterising biocomplexity and soil microbial dynamics along a smelter-damaged landscape gradient [J].
Anand, M ;
Ma, KM ;
Okonski, A ;
Levin, S ;
McCreath, D .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 311 (1-3) :247-259
[2]  
Blair RB, 1999, ECOL APPL, V9, P164, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0164:BABAAU]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
CAIRNS J, 1996, RESTORATION ECOLOGY, P307
[5]   On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology [J].
Caro, TM ;
O'Doherty, G .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) :805-814
[6]   Consequences of changing biodiversity [J].
Chapin, FS ;
Zavaleta, ES ;
Eviner, VT ;
Naylor, RL ;
Vitousek, PM ;
Reynolds, HL ;
Hooper, DU ;
Lavorel, S ;
Sala, OE ;
Hobbie, SE ;
Mack, MC ;
Diaz, S .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6783) :234-242
[7]   THE LAST 150 YEARS - A HISTORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION IN SUDBURY [J].
COURTIN, GM .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 148 (2-3) :99-102
[8]   Bryophyte and vascular plant species richness in boreo-nemoral moist forests and mires [J].
Ingerpuu, N ;
Vellak, K ;
Kukk, T ;
Pärtel, M .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2001, 10 (12) :2153-2166
[9]  
JORDAN WR, 1996, RESTORATION ECOLOGY
[10]   Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest [J].
Lawton, JH ;
Bignell, DE ;
Bolton, B ;
Bloemers, GF ;
Eggleton, P ;
Hammond, PM ;
Hodda, M ;
Holt, RD ;
Larsen, TB ;
Mawdsley, NA ;
Stork, NE ;
Srivastava, DS ;
Watt, AD .
NATURE, 1998, 391 (6662) :72-76