Renal function and requirement for dialysis in chronic nephropathy patients on long-term ramipril: REIN follow-up trial

被引:449
作者
Ruggenenti, P
Perna, A
Gherardi, G
Gaspari, F
Benini, R
Remuzzi, G
机构
[1] Mario Negri Inst Pharmacol Res, Clin Res Ctr Rare Dis Aldo & Cele Dacco, I-24125 Bergamo, Italy
[2] Osped Riuniti Bergamo, Div Nephrol, I-24100 Bergamo, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(98)04433-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The Ramipril Efficacy In Nephropathy (REIN) study found that in patients with chronic nephropathies and proteinuria of 3 g or more per 24 h, ramipril safely reduced the rate of decline of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and halved the combined risk of doubling of serum creatinine or end-stage renal failure (ESRF), as compared with placebo plus conventional antihypertensive drugs at the same level of blood pressure control. At the end of the core study patients continued on or shifted to ramipril and were formally enrolled into the REIN follow-up study. Methods 97 patients entered the follow-up study. Patients originally randomised to ramipril continued with the same daily dose (n=51), whereas those originally on placebo plus conventional antihypertensive drugs switched to ramipril after the first visit of the follow-up study (n=46). Ramipril (1.25 to 5.00 mg/day) and conventional antihypertensive therapy were targeted at achieving diastolic blood pressure under 90 mm Hg. The main efficacy variables were GFR decline and ESRF (need for dialysis). Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings During the follow-up study the mean rate of GFR decline per month decreased from 0.44 (SD 0.54) mL/min per 1.73 m(2) in the core study to 0.10 (0.50) mL/min per 1.73 m(2) in patients originally randomised to ramipril (p=0.017), and from 0.81 (1.12) to 0.14 (0.87) mL/min per 1.73 m(2) in those originally randomised to placebo plus conventional antihypertensive therapy (p=0.017). At the final visit, mean absolute GFR values were 12 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) higher (33% better) in patients randomised to ramipril than in those assigned placebo (n=26 and 17, respectively: 35.5 [19.0] vs 23.8 [9.4] mL/min per 1.73 m(2), p=0.01). 19 of the patients originally on ramipril versus 35 switched from placebo to ramipril progressed to ESRF (p=0.027) during the whole observation period; of these, six (8%) versus 14 (16%) reached that endpoint during the follow-up study; and the risk ratios were 1.86 (95% Cl 1.07-3.26) over the whole observation period and 2.95 (1.13-7.68) during follow-up. Beyond follow-up at month 36, the incidence of ESRF was zero in patients originally randomised to ramipril but 30% in patients on placebo plus conventional antihypertensive therapy. Interpretation In patients with chronic nephropathy and high risk of rapid progression to ESRF, ramipril reversed the tendency of GFR to decline with time. Moreover, a treatment period of sufficient duration (greater than or equal to 36 months) eliminated the need for dialysis. Even patients previously treated with antihypertensive drugs other than angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors benefited shifting to ramipril.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1256
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
GASPARI F, 1995, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V6, P1
[2]   Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Giatras, I ;
Lau, J ;
Levey, AS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (05) :337-+
[3]  
*GRUPP IT STUD EP, 1991, J NEPHROL, V3, P193
[4]   THE EFFECT OF ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITION ON DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY [J].
LEWIS, EJ ;
HUNSICKER, LG ;
BAIN, RP ;
ROHDE, RD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (20) :1456-1462
[5]   Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency [J].
Maschio, G ;
Alberti, D ;
Janin, G ;
Locatelli, F ;
Mann, JFE ;
Motolese, M ;
Ponticelli, C ;
Ritz, E ;
Zucchelli, P ;
Marai, P ;
Marcelli, D ;
Tentori, F ;
Andriani, M ;
Drago, G ;
Meneghel, G ;
Oldrizzi, L ;
Rugiu, C ;
Salvadeo, A ;
Villa, G ;
Picardi, L ;
Borghi, M ;
Moriggi, M ;
Vendramin, G ;
Fusaroli, M ;
Esposti, ED ;
Fabbri, A ;
Koch, KM ;
Frey, U ;
Schaeffer, J ;
Mann, J ;
Schweitzer, C ;
Zuccala, A ;
Gaggi, R ;
Stahl, R ;
Blaser, C ;
Rivolta, E ;
Buccianti, G ;
Gastaldi, L ;
Baratelli, M ;
Ducret, F ;
Pointet, P ;
Sterzel, R ;
Oberdorf, E ;
Pedrini, L ;
Faranna, P ;
Cairo, G ;
Ferrari, L ;
Albertazzi, A ;
Cappelli, P ;
Cantu, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (15) :939-945
[6]   EFFECT OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENT ON KIDNEY-FUNCTION IN DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY [J].
PARVING, HH ;
ANDERSEN, AR ;
SMIDT, UM ;
HOMMEL, E ;
MATHIESEN, ER ;
SVENDSEN, PA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 294 (6585) :1443-1447
[7]  
PERICO N, 1994, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V5, P1139
[8]   BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL, PROTEINURIA, AND THE PROGRESSION OF RENAL-DISEASE - THE MODIFICATION OF DIET IN RENAL-DISEASE STUDY [J].
PETERSON, JC ;
ADLER, S ;
BURKART, JM ;
GREENE, T ;
HEBERT, LA ;
HUNSICKER, LG ;
KING, AJ ;
KLAHR, S ;
MASSRY, SG ;
SEIFTER, JL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 123 (10) :754-+
[9]   Understanding the nature of renal disease progression [J].
Remuzzi, G ;
Ruggenenti, P ;
Benigni, A .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 51 (01) :2-15
[10]  
Ruggenenti P, 1997, LANCET, V349, P1857