Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98:: reliability and validity

被引:16
作者
de Negreiros, Daniel Philippi [1 ]
Augusto da Silva Meleiro, Alexandrina Maria [2 ]
Furlanetto, Leticia M. [3 ]
Trzepacz, Paula T. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Postgrad Program Med Sci, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Med Sch Hosp, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Internal Med, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Mississippi, Sch Med, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
delirium; psychiatric status rating scales; validation studies;
D O I
10.1002/gps.1906
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). Methods The scale was translated into Portuguese and back-translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (n = 64; delirium, depression, dementia, schizophrenia and others) were evaluated by two independent researchers blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnosis and severity of delirium as measured by the DRS-R-98 were compared to clinical diagnosis, Mini-Mental State Exam, Confusion Assessment Method, and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Results Mean and rnedian DRS-R-98 total scores significantly distinguished delirium from the other groups (p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability (ICC between 0.9 and 1) and internal consistency (alpha = 0.91) were very high. DRS-R-98 severity scores correlated highly with the CGI. Mean DRS-R-98 severity scores during delirium differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the post-treatment values. The area under the curve established by ROC analysis was 0.99 and using the cut-off Value of 20 the scale showed sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 94.6%, respectively. Conclusion The Portuguese version of the DRS-R-98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium that distinguishes delirium from other disorders and is sensitive to change in delirium severity, which may be of great value for longitudinal studies. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 477
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[2]   Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for the detection of delirium in the elderly [J].
Fabbri, RMA ;
Moreira, MA ;
Garrido, R ;
Almeida, OP .
ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2001, 59 (2A) :175-179
[3]  
FOLSTEIN MF, 1975, J PSYCHIATR RES, V12, P198
[4]   Spanish version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: Reliability and validity [J].
Fonseca, F ;
Bulbena, A ;
Navarrete, R ;
Aragay, N ;
Capo, M ;
Lobo, A ;
Trzepacz, PT .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2005, 59 (03) :147-151
[5]   Assessing delirium in cancer patients. The Italian versions of the Delirium Rating Scale and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale [J].
Grassi, L ;
Caraceni, A ;
Beltrami, E ;
Borreani, C ;
Zamorani, M ;
Maltoni, M ;
Monti, M ;
Luzzani, M ;
Mercadante, S ;
De Conno, F .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2001, 21 (01) :59-68
[6]   Validation of a cognitive test for delirium in medical ICU patients [J].
Hart, RP ;
Levenson, JL ;
Sessler, CN ;
Best, AM ;
Schwartz, SM ;
Rutherford, LE .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1996, 37 (06) :533-546
[7]   CLARIFYING CONFUSION - THE CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD - A NEW METHOD FOR DETECTION OF DELIRIUM [J].
INOUYE, SK ;
VANDYCK, CH ;
ALESSI, CA ;
BALKIN, S ;
SIEGAL, AP ;
HORWITZ, RI .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (12) :941-948
[8]   Clinical utility and validation of the Japanese version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale in a psychogeriatric inpatient setting [J].
Matsuoka, Y ;
Miyake, Y ;
Arakaki, H ;
Tanaka, K ;
Saeki, T ;
Yamawaki, S .
GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 23 (01) :36-40
[9]  
NEGREIROS DP, 2005, DRSR98 UFSC
[10]  
NORUISIS MJ, 2000, SPSS PC 10 0 BASE MA