Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: Systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer

被引:651
作者
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ]
Ciatto, Stefano
Macaskill, Petra
Lord, Sarah J.
Warren, Ruth M.
Dixon, J. Michael
Irwig, Les
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sch Publ Hlth A27, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Ist Sci Reg Toscana, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Ctr Studio & Prevenz Oncol, Florence, Italy
[4] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh Breast Unit, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose We review the evidence on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging the affected breast to determine its accuracy and impact on treatment. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI in detection of multifocal (MF) and/or multicentric (MC) cancer not identified on conventional imaging. We estimated summary receiver operating characteristic curves, positive predictive value (PPV), true-positive (TP) to false positive (FP) ratio, and examined their variability according to quality criteria. Pooled estimates of the proportion of women whose surgery was altered were calculated. Results Data from 19 studies showed MRI detects additional disease in 16% of women with breast cancer (N = 2,610). MRI incremental accuracy differed according to the reference standard (RS; P = .016) decreasing from 99% to 86% as the quality of the RS increased. Summary PPV was 66% (95% CI, 52% to 77%) and TP: FP ratio was 1.91 (95% CI, 1.09 to 3.34). Conversion from wide local excision (WLE) to mastectomy was 8.1% (95% CI, 5.9 to 11.3), from WLE to more extensive surgery was 11.3% in MF/MC disease (95% CI, 6.8 to 18.3). Due to MRI-detected lesions (in women who did not have additional malignancy on histology) conversion from WLE to mastectomy was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3 to 3.6) and from WLE to more extensive surgery was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.5). Conclusion MRI staging causes more extensive breast surgery in an important proportion of women by identifying additional cancer, however there is a need to reduce FP MRI detection. Randomized trials are needed to determine the clinical value of detecting additional disease which changes surgical treatment in women with apparently localized breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3248 / 3258
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]
Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Fallowfield, L ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (15) :1938-1943
[2]
The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer [J].
Bagley, FH .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 139 (04) :380-383
[3]
Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Bedrosian, I ;
Mick, R ;
Orel, SG ;
Schnall, M ;
Reynolds, C ;
Spitz, FR ;
Callans, LS ;
Buzby, GP ;
Rosato, EF ;
Fraker, DL ;
Czerniecki, BJ .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (03) :468-473
[4]
Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer [J].
Berg, WA ;
Gutierrez, L ;
NessAiver, MS ;
Carter, WB ;
Bhargavan, M ;
Lewis, RS ;
Ioffe, OB .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :830-849
[5]
Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers - Discussion [J].
Grube, Baiba J. ;
Bethke, Kevin P. ;
Harken, Alden H. ;
Velasco, Jose M. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (05) :445-447
[6]
BREAST-TUMORS - COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF MR-IMAGING RELATIVE TO MAMMOGRAPHY AND US FOR DEMONSTRATING EXTENT [J].
BOETES, C ;
MUS, RDM ;
HOLLAND, R ;
BARENTSZ, JO ;
STRIJK, SP ;
WOBBES, T ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
RUYS, SHJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) :743-747
[7]
Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: Impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis [J].
Deurloo, EE ;
Peterse, JL ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Besnard, APE ;
Muller, SH ;
Gilhuijs, KGA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (10) :1393-1401
[8]
Dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer [J].
Drew, PJ ;
Chatterjee, S ;
Turnbull, LW ;
Read, J ;
Carleton, PJ ;
Fox, JN ;
Monson, JRT ;
Kerin, MJ .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 6 (06) :599-603
[9]
Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: Evidence for improved preoperative staging [J].
Esserman, L ;
Hylton, N ;
Yassa, L ;
Barclay, J ;
Frankel, S ;
Sickles, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :110-119
[10]
Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach [J].
Fischer, U ;
Kopka, L ;
Grabbe, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (03) :881-888