Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease

被引:90
作者
Delmée, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Microbiol Unit, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Clostridium difficile; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1046/j.1198-743x.2001.00294.x
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is based on culture and toxin detection in fecal specimens. Culture is performed on a commercially available selective media. C. difficile colony morphology is typical when viewed under a dissecting microscope. Definitive identification is best obtained by gas liquid chromatography. Culture is very sensitive but, when used alone without toxin testing, it leads to low specificity and misdiagnosis of CDAD when high rates of asymptomatic carriage exist. Toxin detection by a tissue culture cytotoxin assay followed by neutralisation with specific antiserum is often considered the standard. However, this approach lacks sensitivity and has not detected up to 30% of patients with confirmed CDAD. Multiple enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have been introduced by various manufacturers for the detection of toxin A alone or for both toxins A and B. Some of these are designed to give results in less than 1 h. Comparative studies of EIA kits reported that the sensitivity and specificity are slightly lower than cytotoxin assays. Toxigenic culture tests C. difficile isolates for toxin production: colonies isolated on selective media are tested for in-vitro toxin production either by a cytotoxicity assay or by direct EIA. It has higher sensitivity than the cytotoxicity assay and equivalent specificity. In the routine laboratory, culture and toxin detection should be performed on every specimen and, in culture-positive and fecal toxin-negative cases, toxigenic cultures should be performed on isolated colonies.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 416
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] al-Barrak A, 1999, Can Commun Dis Rep, V25, P65
  • [2] Characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile responsible for a nosocomial outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea
    Alfa, MJ
    Kabani, A
    Lyerly, D
    Moncrief, S
    Neville, LM
    Al-Barrak, A
    Harding, GKH
    Dyck, B
    Olekson, K
    Embil, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (07) : 2706 - 2714
  • [3] RAPID POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION METHOD FOR SPECIFIC DETECTION OF TOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE
    ARZESE, A
    TRANI, G
    RIUL, L
    BOTTA, GA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 14 (08) : 716 - 719
  • [4] Usefulness of simultaneous detection of toxin A and glutamate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diseases
    Barbut, F
    Lalande, V
    Daprey, G
    Cohen, P
    Marle, N
    Burghoffer, B
    Petit, JC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 19 (06) : 481 - 484
  • [5] COMPARISON OF 3 ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS, A CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY, AND TOXIGENIC CULTURE FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA
    BARBUT, F
    KAJZER, C
    PLANAS, N
    PETIT, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (04) : 963 - 967
  • [6] Barbut Frederic, 1997, Clin Microbiol Infect, V3, P480, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1997.tb00286.x
  • [7] Multicentre evaluation of a commercial test for the rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-mediated antibiotic-associated diarrhoea
    Bentley, AH
    Patel, NB
    Sidorczuk, M
    Loy, P
    Fulcher, J
    Dexter, P
    Richards, J
    Borriello, SP
    Zak, K
    Thorn, EM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 17 (11) : 788 - 790
  • [8] SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR THE ROUTINE ISOLATION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE FROM FECES
    BORRIELLO, SP
    HONOUR, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1981, 34 (10) : 1124 - 1127
  • [9] The epidemiology and typing of Clostridium difficile
    Brazier, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 41 : 47 - 57
  • [10] BRAZIER JS, 1993, CLIN INFECT DIS