Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review

被引:172
作者
Gaff, Clara L.
Clarke, Angus J.
Atkinson, Paul
Sivell, Stephanie
Elwyn, Glyn
Iredale, Rachel
Thornton, Hazel
Dundon, Joanna
Shaw, Chris
Edwards, Adrian
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp, Genet Hlth Serv Victoria, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Cardiff Univ, Inst Med Genet, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci Res, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Cardiff, Wales
[4] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust, Torfaen, England
关键词
family; communication; genetic counselling; genetic predisposition to disease; risk;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201883
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The communication of risk is a central activity in clinical genetics, with genetic health professionals encouraging the dissemination of relevant information by individuals to their at-risk family members. To understand the process by which communication occurs as well as its outcomes, a systematic review of actual communication in families about genetic risk was conducted. Findings from 29 papers meeting the inclusion criteria were summarised and are presented narratively. Family communication about genetic risk is described as a deliberative process, in which: sense is made of personal risk; the vulnerability and receptivity of the family member is assessed; decisions are made about what will be conveyed; and the right time to disclose is selected. The communication strategy adopted will depend on these factors and varies within families as well as between families. Inherent in these processes are conflicting senses of responsibility: to provide potentially valuable information and to prevent harm that may arise from this knowledge. However, the research 'outcomes' of communication have been professionally determined (number of relatives reported as informed, uptake of testing, knowledge of the recipient) and are typically unrelated to the concerns of the family member. The impact of communication on the individual, family members, and family relationships is of concern to the individual conveying the information, but this is largely self-reported. Currently, there is insufficient information to inform the development of theoretically and empirically based practice to foster 'good' communication. The implications for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1011
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The messenger's dilemmas -: giving and getting information in genealogical mapping for hereditary cancer [J].
Adelswärd, V ;
Sachs, L .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2003, 5 (02) :125-138
[2]  
*AMSTAR, 2005, PROP EV TOOLS COMP
[3]  
[Anonymous], J HLTH CARE LAW POLI
[4]  
AYME S, 1993, NEUROMUSCULAR DISORD, V3, P571, DOI 10.1016/0960-8966(93)90118-4
[5]  
Binedell J, 1998, CLIN GENET, V54, P489
[6]   Testing participation in BRCA1/2-positive families:: Initiator role of index cases [J].
Blandy, C ;
Chabal, F ;
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ;
Julian-Reynier, C .
GENETIC TESTING, 2003, 7 (03) :225-233
[7]  
Bonadona V, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P97
[8]   Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients [J].
Claes, E ;
Evers-Kiebooms, G ;
Boogaerts, A ;
Decruyenaere, M ;
Denayer, L ;
Legius, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 116A (01) :11-19
[9]   Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families [J].
Clarke, A ;
Richards, M ;
Kerzin-Storrar, L ;
Halliday, J ;
Young, MA ;
Simpson, SA ;
Featherstone, K ;
Forrest, K ;
Lucassen, A ;
Morrison, PJ ;
Quarrell, OWJ ;
Stewart, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2005, 13 (05) :556-562
[10]   Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk Relatives:: A cancer risk assessment program's experience [J].
Costalas, JW ;
Itzen, M ;
Malick, J ;
Babb, JS ;
Bove, B ;
Godwin, AK ;
Daly, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2003, 119C (01) :11-18