The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold

被引:67
作者
Leitch, CR [1 ]
Walker, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1998年 / 105卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10176.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the reasons for the rise in caesarean section rate and note any change in indications. Design A retrospective, descriptive study comparing the years 1962 and 1992. Setting A large city centre teaching hospital. Results There was an overall increase in the caesarean section rate from 6.8% in 1962 to 18.1% in 1992. No single cause contributed more than 30% towards this increase. The main indications in both years were similar: failure to progress (42.2% vs 36.7%) and fetal indications (18.1% vs 18.9%). The largest relative increases were in the malpresentation group (10.8% vs 16%) and previous caesarean section(45% vs 15.2%). Conclusions These results suggest that there has been a lowering in the overall threshold concerning the decision to carry out a caesarean section rather than changes in obstetric management. Obstetricians and the women in their care have to decide whether the current balance between risk and benefit is acceptable or whether they wish to alter the underlying philosophy if any significant reduction is to be sustained.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 626
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9000) :544-544
[2]   WHAT IS THE CORRECT CESAREAN-SECTION RATE [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (05) :403-404
[3]   A CLINICAL-TRIAL OF ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF LABOR [J].
FRIGOLETTO, FD ;
LIEBERIAN, E ;
LANG, JM ;
COHEN, A ;
BARSS, V ;
RINGER, S ;
DATTA, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (12) :745-750
[4]   Caesarean section or vaginal birth for breech presentation at term - We need better evidence as to which is better [J].
Hannah, M ;
Hannah, W .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7044) :1433-1434
[5]  
HAWKINS JL, 1995, REGION ANESTH, V20, P50
[6]   THE ROLE OF POSTNATAL X-RAY PELVIMETRY AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SUBSEQUENT DELIVERY [J].
KRISHNAMURTHY, S ;
FAIRLIE, F ;
CAMERON, AD ;
WALKER, JJ ;
MACKENZIE, JR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (07) :716-718
[7]   CESAREAN-SECTION RATES - EVALUATE THE REASONS FOR SURGERY [J].
LEITCH, CR ;
WALKER, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6921) :133-134
[9]   WHAT IS HAPPENING TO CESAREAN-SECTION RATES [J].
MACFARLANE, A ;
CHAMBERLAIN, G .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8878) :1005-1006
[10]   Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section [J].
McMahon, MJ ;
Luther, ER ;
Bowes, WA ;
Olshan, AF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (10) :689-695