Electric field strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a finite element simulation study

被引:161
作者
Deng, Zhi-De [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lisanby, Sarah H. [1 ,3 ]
Peterchev, Angel V. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Elect Engn, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Div Brain Stimulat & Therapeut Modulat, Dept Psychiat, New York State Psychiat Inst, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION; HETEROGENEOUS BRAIN-TISSUE; HUMAN SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; CORTICAL STIMULATION; NEURAL STIMULATION; PERIPHERAL-NERVE; HEAD MODEL; IN-VIVO; THEORETICAL CALCULATION; DIELECTRIC-PROPERTIES;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2560/8/1/016007
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
We present the first computational study comparing the electric field induced by various electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST) paradigms. Four ECT electrode configurations (bilateral, bifrontal, right unilateral, and focal electrically administered seizure therapy) and three MST coil configurations (circular, cap, and double cone) were modeled. The model incorporated a modality-specific neural activation threshold. ECT (0.3 ms pulse width) and MST induced the maximum electric field of 2.1-2.5 V cm(-1) and 1.1-2.2 V cm(-1) in the brain, corresponding to 6.2-7.2 times and 1.2-2.3 times the neural activation threshold, respectively. The MST electric field is more confined to the superficial cortex compared to ECT. The brain volume stimulated was much larger with ECT (up to 100%) than with MST (up to 8.2%). MST with the double-cone coil was the most focal, and bilateral ECT was the least focal. Our results suggest a possible biophysical explanation of the reduced side effects of MST compared to ECT. Our results also indicate that the conventional ECT pulse amplitude (800-900 mA) is much higher than necessary for seizure induction. Reducing the ECT pulse amplitude should be explored as a potential means of diminishing side effects.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]
MODELING OF MAGNETIC-FIELD STIMULATION OF BENT NEURONS [J].
ABDEEN, MA ;
STUCHLY, MA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 41 (11) :1092-1095
[2]
Abrams R., 2002, Electroconvulsive Therapy, V4th
[3]
Dynamic variations of local cerebral blood flow in maximal electroshock seizures in the rat [J].
André, V ;
Henry, D ;
Nehlig, A .
EPILEPSIA, 2002, 43 (10) :1120-1128
[4]
[Anonymous], 2001, The practice of electroconvulsive therapy: recommendations for treatment, training, and privileging (a task force report of the American Psychiatric Association)
[5]
[Anonymous], 2007, INT J VEH SAF, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJVS.2007.016747
[6]
Neurophysiological effects of stimulation through electrodes in the human subthalamic nucleus [J].
Ashby, P ;
Kim, YJ ;
Kumar, R ;
Lang, AE ;
Lozano, AM .
BRAIN, 1999, 122 :1919-1931
[7]
Immediate motor effects of stimulation through electrodes implanted in the human globus pallidus [J].
Ashby, P ;
Strafella, A ;
Dostrovsky, JO ;
Lozano, A ;
Lang, AE .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 70 (01) :1-18
[8]
Potentials recorded at the scalp by stimulation near the human subthalamic nucleus [J].
Ashby, P ;
Paradiso, G ;
Saint-Cyr, JA ;
Chen, R ;
Lang, AE ;
Lozano, AM .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :431-437
[9]
Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex [J].
Balslev, Daniela ;
Braet, Wouter ;
McAllister, Craig ;
Miall, R. Chris .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 162 (1-2) :309-313
[10]
BARKER AT, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, P227