Teaching medical students the important connection between communication and clinical reasoning

被引:83
作者
Windish, DM
Price, EG
Clever, SL
Magaziner, JL
Thomas, PA
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Primary Care Residency Program, Dept Internal Med, Waterbury, CT 06721 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
communication skills; clinical reasoning; medical education (undergraduate); reflection; feedback;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0244.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Medical students are rarely taught how to integrate communication and clinical reasoning. Not understanding the relation between these skills may lead students to undervalue the connection between psychosocial and biomedical aspects of patient care. OBJECTIVE: To improve medical students' communication and clinical reasoning and their appreciation of how these skills interrelate in medical practice. DESIGN. In 2003, we conducted a randomized trial of a curricular intervention at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. In a 6-week course, participants learned communication and clinical reasoning skills in an integrative fashion using small group exercises with role-play, reflection and feedback through a structured iterative reflective process. PARTICIPANTS: Second-year medical students. MEASUREMENTS: All students interviewed standardized patients who evaluated their communication skills in establishing rapport, data gathering and patient education/counseling on a 5-point scale (1=poor; 5=excellent). We assessed clinical reasoning through the number of correct problems listed and differential diagnoses generated and the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory. Students rated the importance of learning these skills in an integrated fashion. RESULTS: Standardized patients rated curricular students more favorably in establishing rapport (4.1 vs 3.9; P=.05). Curricular participants listed more psychosocial history items on their problem lists (65% of curricular students listing >= 1 item vs 44% of controls; P=.008). Groups did not differ significantly in other communication or clinical reasoning measures. Ninety-five percent of participants rated the integration of these skills as important. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention students performed better in certain communication and clinical reasoning skills. These students recognized the importance of biomedical and psychosocial issues in patient care. Educators may wish to teach the integration of these skills early in medical training.
引用
收藏
页码:1108 / 1113
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AAMC, 1998, 1 AAMC MED SCH OBJ
[2]  
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), OUTC PROJ ENH RES ED
[3]  
Bird J, 1990, Adv Psychosom Med, V20, P65
[4]   QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC ABILITY [J].
BORDAGE, G ;
GRANT, J ;
MARSDEN, P .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1990, 24 (05) :413-425
[5]   EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION-SKILLS TRAINING ON STUDENTS DIAGNOSTIC EFFICIENCY [J].
EVANS, BJ ;
STANLEY, RO ;
MESTROVIC, R ;
ROSE, L .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1991, 25 (06) :517-526
[6]   A NEW MODEL FOR PHYSICIAN-PATIENT COMMUNICATION [J].
KELLER, VF ;
CARROLL, JG .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1994, 23 (02) :131-140
[7]   Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning [J].
Kempainen, RR ;
Migeon, MB ;
Wolf, FM .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2003, 25 (02) :177-181
[8]  
Kern DE., 1998, CURRICULUM DEV MED E
[9]  
Kurtz S., 1998, TEACHING LEARNING CO
[10]   The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: An aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes [J].
Kurtz, SM ;
Silverman, JD .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1996, 30 (02) :83-89