Bias Correction for Global Ensemble Forecast

被引:135
作者
Cui, Bo [1 ]
Toth, Zoltan [2 ]
Zhu, Yuejian
Hou, Dingchen
机构
[1] NOAA NWS NCEP Environm Modeling Ctr, IM Syst Grp, Camp Springs, MD 20746 USA
[2] NOAA ESRL Global Syst Div, Boulder, CO USA
关键词
MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS; PREDICTION; ERROR; NCEP;
D O I
10.1175/WAF-D-11-00011.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The main task of this study is to introduce a statistical postprocessing algorithm to reduce the bias in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC) ensemble forecasts before they are merged to form a joint ensemble within the North American Ensemble Forecast System (NAEFS). This statistical postprocessing method applies a Kalman filter type algorithm to accumulate the decaying averaging bias and produces bias-corrected ensembles for 35 variables. NCEP implemented this bias-correction technique in 2006. NAEFS is a joint operational multimodel ensemble forecast system that combines NCEP and MSC ensemble forecasts after bias correction. According to operational statistical verification, both the NCEP and MSC bias-corrected ensemble forecast products are enhanced significantly. In addition to the operational calibration technique, three other experiments were designed to assess and mitigate ensemble biases on the model grid: a decaying averaging bias calibration method with short samples, a climate mean bias calibration method, and a bias calibration method using dependent data. Preliminary results show that the decaying averaging method works well for the first few days. After removing the decaying averaging bias, the calibrated NCEP operational ensemble has improved probabilistic performance for all measures until day 5. The reforecast ensembles from the Earth System Research Laboratory's Physical Sciences Division with and without the climate mean bias correction were also examined. A comparison between the operational and the bias-corrected reforecast ensembles shows that the climate mean bias correction can add value, especially for week-2 probability forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 410
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Deterministic Ensemble Forecasts Using Gene-Expression Programming
    Bakhshaii, Atoossa
    Stull, Roland
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2009, 24 (05) : 1431 - 1451
  • [2] The Multiensemble Approach: The NAEFS Example
    Candille, Guillem
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2009, 137 (05) : 1655 - 1665
  • [3] Carter G.M., 1989, WEA FORECASTING, V4, P401, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004LT
  • [4] 0401:SFBOTNGT
  • [5] 2.0.CO
  • [6] 2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004]
  • [7] Toward Random Sampling of Model Error in the Canadian Ensemble Prediction System
    Charron, Martin
    Pellerin, Gerard
    Spacek, Lubos
    Houtekamer, P. L.
    Gagnon, Normand
    Mitchell, Herschel L.
    Michelin, Laurent
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2010, 138 (05) : 1877 - 1901
  • [8] Strengths and weaknesses of MOS, running-mean bias removal, and Kalman filter techniques for improving model forecasts over the western United States
    Cheng, William Y. Y.
    Steenburgh, W. James
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2007, 22 (06) : 1304 - 1318
  • [9] Comparative analysis of the local observation-based (LOB) method and the nonparametric regression-based method for gridded bias correction in mesoscale weather forecasting
    Gel, Yulia R.
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2007, 22 (06) : 1243 - 1256
  • [10] Glahn H. R., 1972, Journal of Applied Meteorology, V11, P1203, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<1203:TUOMOS>2.0.CO