Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999 to 2002

被引:177
作者
McNamara, RL
Herrin, J
Bradley, EH
Portnay, EL
Curtis, JP
Wang, YF
Magid, DJ
Blaney, M
Krumholz, HM
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Sect Hlth Policy & Adm, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Flying Buttress Associates, Charlottesville, VA USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente, Clin Res Unit, Denver, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Denver, CO USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Prevent Med & Biometr, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[8] Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[9] Yale New Haven Hlth Syst, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.071
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to analyze recent trends in door-to-reperfusion time and to identify hospital characteristics associated with improved performance. BACKGROUND Rapid reperfusion improves survival for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS In this retrospective observational study front the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3 and -4, between 1999 and 2002, we analyzed door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times in patients admitted with STEMI and receiving fibrinolytic therapy, (n = 68,439 patients in 1,015 hospitals) or percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 33,647 patients in 421 hospitals) within 6 h of hospital arrival. RESULTS In 1999, only 46% of the patients in the fibrinolytic therapy cohort were treated within the recommended 30-min door-to-needle time; only 35% of the patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention cohort were treated within the recommended 90-min door-to-balloon time. Improvement in these times to reperfusion over the four-year study period was not statistically significant (door-to-needle: -0.01 min/year, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.24 to +0.23, p > 0.9; door-to-balloon: -0.57 min/year, 95% CI -1.24 to +0.10, p = 0.09). Only 33% (337 of 1,015) of hospitals improved door-to-needle time by, more than one min/year, and 26% (110 of 421) improved door-to-balloon time by more than three min/year. No hospital characteristic was significantly associated with improvement in door-to-needle time. Only, high annual percutaneous coronary intervention volume and location in New England were significantly associated with greater improvement in door-to-balloon time. CONCLUSIONS Fewer than one-half of patients with STEMI receive reperfusion in the recommended door-to-needle or door-to-balloon time, and mean time to reperfusion has not decreased significantly in recent years. Relatively few hospitals have shown substantial improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 51
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Task force 1: The ACCF and AHA codes of conduct in human subjects research
    Adams, RJ
    Antman, EM
    Kavey, REW
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (16) : 2512 - 2516
  • [2] Predictors of door-to-balloon delay in primary angioplasty
    Angeja, BG
    Gibson, CM
    Chin, R
    Frederick, PD
    Every, NR
    Ross, AM
    Stone, GW
    Barron, HV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 89 (10) : 1156 - 1161
  • [3] *ANN SURV HOSP DAT, 1998, DOC 1998 DAT
  • [4] Factors associated with delay in reperfusion therapy in elderly Patients with acute myocardial infarction: Analysis of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
    Berger, AK
    Radford, MJ
    Krumholz, HM
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 139 (06) : 985 - 992
  • [5] Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction - Results from the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) Trial
    Berger, PB
    Ellis, SG
    Holmes, DR
    Granger, CB
    Criger, DA
    Betriu, A
    Topol, EJ
    Califf, RM
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [6] Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1079
  • [7] Achieving door-to-balloon times that meet quality guidelines - How do successful hospitals do it?
    Bradley, EH
    Roumanis, SA
    Radford, MJ
    Webster, TR
    McNamara, RL
    Mattera, JA
    Barton, BA
    Berg, DN
    Portnay, EL
    Moscovitz, H
    Parkosewich, J
    Holmboe, ES
    Blaney, M
    Krumholz, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (07) : 1236 - 1241
  • [8] Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
    Cannon, CP
    Gibson, CM
    Lambrew, CT
    Shoultz, DA
    Levy, D
    French, WJ
    Gore, JM
    Weaver, WD
    Rogers, WJ
    Tiefenbrunn, AJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (22): : 2941 - +
  • [9] Cannon CP, 2000, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V35, p376A
  • [10] Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction - Every minute of delay counts
    De Luca, G
    Suryapranata, H
    Ottervanger, JP
    Antman, EM
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (10) : 1223 - 1225