Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations

被引:214
作者
Handa, VL
Danielsen, BH
Gilbert, WM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Hlth Informat Solut, Redwood City, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01445-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the frequency of obstetric anal sphincter laceration and to identify characteristics associated with this complication, including modifiable risk factors. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective study of over 2 million vaginal deliveries at California hospitals was performed, using information from birth certificates and discharge summaries for 1992 through 1997. We excluded preterm births, stillbirths, breech deliveries, and multiple gestations. The main outcome measure was obstetric anal sphincter laceration (third and fourth degree). RESULTS: The frequency of anal sphincter lacerations was 5.85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.82, 5.88), decreasing significantly from 6.35% (95% CI 6.27, 6.43) in 1992 to 5.43% (95% Cl 5.35, 5.51) in 1997 (P < .01). Using logistic regression analysis, we identified primiparity as the dominant risk factor (odds ratio [OR] for women with prior vaginal birth 0.15; 95% CI 0.14, 0.15). Birth weight over 4000 g was also highly significant (OR 2.17; 95% CI 2.07, 2.27). Lacerations occurred more often among women of certain racial and ethnic groups: Indian women (OR 2.5; 95% CI 2.23, 2.79) and Filipina women (OR 1.63; 95% Cl 1.50, 1.77) were at highest risk. Episiotomy decreased the likelihood of third-degree lacerations (OR 0.81; 95% Cl 0.78, 0.85), but increased the risk of fourth-degree lacerations (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.05, 1.19). Operative delivery increased the risk of sphincter laceration, with vacuum delivery (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.21, 2.40) presenting a greater risk than forceps delivery (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.37,1.52). CONCLUSION: Anal sphincter lacerations are strongly associated with primiparity, macrosomia, and operative vaginal delivery. Of the modifiable risk factors, operative vaginal delivery remains the dominant independent variable. (C) 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 230
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1997, 73 (01) :1-4
[2]   Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery:: The University of Miami experience [J].
Angioli, R ;
Gómez-Marín, O ;
Cantuaria, G ;
O'Sullivan, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1083-1085
[3]   Risk factors for rupture of the anal sphincter [J].
Buchhave, P ;
Flatow, L ;
Rydhstroem, H ;
Thorbert, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1999, 87 (02) :129-132
[4]  
Curtin S C, 1999, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V47, P1
[5]  
GREEN JR, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V73, P732
[6]  
HAADEM K, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P53
[7]   A prospective cohort study of women after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter laceration [J].
Kammerer-Doak, DN ;
Wesol, AB ;
Rogers, RG ;
Dominguez, CE ;
Dorin, MH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (06) :1317-1322
[8]   Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy [J].
Labrecque, M ;
Eason, E ;
Marcoux, S ;
Lemieux, F ;
Pinault, JJ ;
Feldman, P ;
Laperrière, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (03) :593-600
[9]  
Margolin BH., 1988, ENCY STAT SCI, V9, P334
[10]   Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration [J].
Peleg, D ;
Kennedy, CM ;
Merrill, D ;
Zlatnik, FJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (06) :1021-1024