Economic consequences of alterations in platelet transfusion dose: analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial

被引:36
作者
Ackerman, SJ
Klumpp, TR
Guzman, GI
Herman, JH
Gaughan, JP
Bleecker, GC
Mangan, KF
机构
[1] Covance Hlth Econ & Outcomes Serv Inc, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[2] Temple Univ, Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40121457.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In recent years, decreasing financial resources led to the use of lower-dose platelet components. However, the economic consequences of the use of such components have not been carefully studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A formal economic analysis was conducted of a recently reported, prospective, randomized, double-blind study examining the platelet dose-response relationship in nonrefractory patients. The economic analysis used a decision analysis model, conducted from the hospital's perspective and based directly on the observed clinical data and on institutional cost structures. RESULTS: The decision analysis model estimated that a 38-percent reduction in mean platelet dose, within the commonly prescribed dose range, would result in the average patient's requiring approximately 60 percent more transfusions in the posttransplant period (8 vs. 5; p = 0.05), which would result in an estimated 60-percent increase in the median cost to the hospital ($4486/patient vs. $2804/patient [in 1996 US dollars], p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Efforts to decrease costs by utilizing lower-dose single-donor platelet transfusions are predicted to result in a disproportionate increase in the number of transfusions per patient, with a corresponding increase in overall hospital transfusion costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1462
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   HEMAPHERESIS LISTENING POST - THE GROWING PRACTICE OF SPLITTING DOUBLE-DOSE APHERESIS PLATELET PRODUCTS [J].
AXELROD, FB .
TRANSFUSION SCIENCE, 1993, 14 (04) :364-368
[2]  
Benson K., 1996, Transfusion (Bethesda), V36, p4S
[3]   FACTORS INFLUENCING 20-HOUR INCREMENTS AFTER PLATELET TRANSFUSION [J].
BISHOP, JF ;
MATTHEWS, JP ;
MCGRATH, K ;
YUEN, K ;
WOLF, MM ;
SZER, J .
TRANSFUSION, 1991, 31 (05) :392-396
[4]  
BISHOP JF, 1988, BLOOD, V71, P383
[5]   HEMAPHERESIS LISTENING POST - STANDARDIZATION OF PLATELETPHERESIS PRODUCTS [J].
CIAVARELLA, DA .
TRANSFUSION SCIENCE, 1993, 14 (04) :363-363
[6]   TRANSFUSIONS OF FRESH PLATELET CONCENTRATES TO PATIENTS WITH SECONDARY THROMBOCYTOPENIA [J].
DJERASSI, I ;
FARBER, S ;
EVANS, AE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1963, 268 (05) :221-&
[7]   RESPONSE TO REPEATED PLATELET TRANSFUSION FROM SAME DONOR [J].
FREIREICH, EJ ;
MANTEL, N ;
KLIMAN, A ;
GAYDOS, LA ;
FREI, E .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1963, 59 (03) :277-+
[8]   Economic impact of donor platelet count and platelet yield in apheresis products: Relevance for emerging issues in platelet transfusion therapy [J].
Goodnough, LT ;
Ali, S ;
Despotis, G ;
Dynis, M ;
DiPersio, JF .
VOX SANGUINIS, 1999, 76 (01) :43-49
[9]  
HANSON SR, 1985, BLOOD, V66, P1105
[10]  
HERMAN JH, 1992, CLINICAL DECISIONS IN PLATELET THERAPY, P19