Variations in the axis of motion during head repositioning - A comparison of subjects with whiplash-associated disorders or non-specific neck pain and healthy controls

被引:51
作者
Grip, Helena [1 ]
Sundelin, Gunnevi
Gerdle, Bjoern
Karlsson, J. Stefan
机构
[1] Umea Univ Hosp, S-90185 Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Community Med & Rehabil, Umea, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Fac Hlth Sci, INR, Dept Rehabil Med, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Pain & Rehabil Ctr, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
axis of motion; helical axis; whiplash; neck pain; proprioception; fear avoidance; movement analysis; variance;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.05.008
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
Background. The ability to reproduce head position can be affected in patients after a neck injury. The repositioning error is commonly used as a measure of proprioception, but variations in the movement might provide additional information. Methods. The axis of motion and target performance were analyzed during a head repositioning task (flexion, extension and side rotations) for 24 control subjects, 22 subjects with whiplash-associated disorders and 21 with non-specific neck pain. Questionnaires regarding pain intensity and fear avoidance were collected. Head position and axis of motion parameters were calculated using a helical axis model with a moving window of 4 degrees. Findings. During flexion the whiplash group had a larger constant repositioning error than the control group (-1.8(2.9)degrees vs. 0.1(2.4)degrees, P = 0.04). The axis was more inferior in both neck pain groups (12.0(1.6) cm vs. 14.5(2.0) cm, P < 0.05) indicating movement at a lower level in the spine. Including pain intensity from shoulder and neck region as covariates showed an effect on the axis position (P = 0.03 and 0.04). During axial rotation to the left there was more variation in axis direction for neckpain groups as compared with controls (4.0(1.7)degrees and 3.7(2.4)degrees vs. 2.3(1.9)degrees, P = 0.01 and 0.05). No significant difference in fear avoidance was found between the two neck pain groups. Interpretation. Measuring variation in the axis of motion together with target performance gives objective measures on proprioceptive ability that are difficult to quantify by visual inspection. Repositioning errors were in general small, suggesting it is not sufficient as a single measurement variable in a clinical situation, but should be measured in combination with other tests, such as range of motion. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 873
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2005, Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis
[2]
Ariëns GAM, 2001, AM J IND MED, V39, P180, DOI 10.1002/1097-0274(200102)39:2<180::AID-AJIM1005>3.0.CO
[3]
2-#
[4]
Bernard B.P., 1997, NIOSH
[5]
ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN .1. ASPECTS OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE [J].
CARLSSON, AM .
PAIN, 1983, 16 (01) :87-101
[6]
A spot check for estimating stereophotogrammetric errors [J].
U. Della Croce ;
A. Cappozzo .
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 2000, 38 (3) :260-266
[7]
Heikkila H, 1996, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V28, P133
[8]
Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility, active range of cervical motion, and oculomotor function in patients with whiplash injury [J].
Heikkila, HV ;
Wenngren, BI .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 79 (09) :1089-1094
[9]
A study of five cervicocephalic relocation tests in three different subject groups [J].
Kristjansson, E ;
Dall'Alba, P ;
Jull, G .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 17 (07) :768-774
[10]
Psychometric properties of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in patients with neck pain [J].
Lee, Kwok-Chung ;
Chiu, Thomas T. W. ;
Lam, Tai-Hing .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2006, 20 (10) :909-920