Clinical decision guidelines for NHS cosmetic surgery: analysis of current limitations and recommendations for future development

被引:26
作者
Cook, SA
Rosser, R
Meah, S
James, MI
Salmon, P
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Clin Psychol, Liverpool L69 3GB, Merseyside, England
[2] Whiston Hosp, St Helens & Knowsley Hosp NHS Trust, Prescot, Merseyside, England
[3] S Sefton PCT, Dept Publ Hlth, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY | 2003年 / 56卷 / 05期
关键词
cosmetic surgery; decision-making; guidelines; rationing;
D O I
10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00183-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Because of increasing demand for publicly funded elective cosmetic surgery, clinical decision guidelines have been developed to select those patients who should receive it. The aims of this study were to identify: the main characteristics of such guidelines; whether and how they influence clinical decision making; and ways in which they should be improved. UK health authorities were asked for their current guidelines for elective cosmetic surgery and, in a single plastic surgery unit, we examined the impact of its guidelines by observing consultations and interviewing surgeons and managers. Of 115 authorities approached, 32 reported using guidelines and provided sufficient information for anatysis. GuideLines mostly concerned arbitrary sets of cosmetic procedures and lacked reference to an evidence base. They allowed surgery for specified anatomical, functional or symptomatic reasons, but these indications varied between guidelines. Most guidelines also permitted surgery 'exceptionally' for psychological reasons. The guidelines that were studied in detail did not appreciably influence surgeons' decisions, which reflected criteria that were not cited in the guidelines, including cost of the procedure and whether patients sought restoration or improvement of their appearance. Decision guidelines in this area have several limitations. Future guidelines should: include all cosmetic procedures; be informed by a broad range of evidence; and, arguably, include several nonclinical criteria that currently inform surgeons' decision-making. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Association of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
*AM SOC PLAST SURG, 2002, NAT CLEAR PLAST SURG
[2]   Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: the problem of changing doctors' behaviour [J].
Armstrong, D .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (10) :1771-1777
[3]   HEALTH-SERVICE PRIORITIES - EXPLORATIONS IN CONSULTATION OF THE PUBLIC AND HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS ON PRIORITY SETTING IN AN INNER LONDON HEALTH DISTRICT [J].
BOWLING, A ;
JACOBSON, B ;
SOUTHGATE, L .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1993, 37 (07) :851-857
[4]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETIC PLASTIC-SURGERY [J].
BRADBURY, E .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 18 (03) :301-305
[5]   MEASURING OUTCOME IN LOW-PRIORITY PLASTIC-SURGERY PATIENTS USING QUALITY-OF-LIFE INDEXES [J].
COLE, RP ;
SHAKESPEARE, V ;
SHAKESPEARE, P ;
HOBBY, JAE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 47 (02) :117-121
[6]  
Eccles M, 1996, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V312, P760
[7]   Five-year follow-up of cosmetic rhinoplasty [J].
Ercolani, M ;
Baldaro, B ;
Rossi, N ;
Trombini, G .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1999, 47 (03) :283-286
[8]   Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal [J].
Grilli, R ;
Magrini, N ;
Penna, A ;
Mura, G ;
Liberati, A .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9198) :103-106
[9]   Improving the quality of medical care - Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction [J].
Grol, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (20) :2578-2585
[10]   Cosmetic surgery: Surgical tools - Psychosocial goals [J].
Grossbart, TA ;
Sarwer, DB .
SEMINARS IN CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 1999, 18 (02) :101-111