Effect of NOM characteristics and membrane type on microfiltration performance

被引:95
作者
Gray, S. R.
Ritchie, C. B.
Tran, T.
Bolto, B. A.
机构
[1] Victoria Univ, Inst Sustainabil & Innovat, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[2] P3M, Nar Nar Goon N, Vic 3812, Australia
[3] CSIRO Mfg & Mat Technol, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia
关键词
microfiltration; membranes; natural organic matter; fouling;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Efforts to understand and predict the role of different organic fractions in the fouling of low-pressure membranes are presented. Preliminary experiments with an experimental apparatus that incorporates automatic backwashing and filtration over several days has shown that microfiltration (MF) of the hydrophilic fractions leads to rapid flux decline and the formation of a cake or gel layer, while the hydrophobic fractions show a steady flux decline and no obvious formation of a gel or cake layer. The addition of calcium to the weakly hydrophobic acid (WHA) fraction led to the formation of a gel layer from associations between components of the WHA. The dominant foulants were found to be neutral and charged hydrophilic compounds, with hydrophobic and small pore size membranes being the most readily fouled. The findings suggest that surface analyses such as FTIR will preferentially identify hydrophilic compounds as the main foulants, as these components form a gel layer on the surface while the hydrophobic compounds adsorb within the membrane pores. Furthermore, coagulation pre-treatment is also likely to reduce fouling by reducing pore constriction rather than the formation of a gel layer, as coagulants remove the hydrophobic compounds to a large extent and very little of the hydrophilic neutral components. Crown Copyright (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3833 / 3841
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Interactions between natural organic matter (NOM) and membranes: Rejection and fouling [J].
Amy, G ;
Cho, J .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 40 (09) :131-139
[2]  
Amy G. L, 2001, NOM REJECTION FOULIN
[3]   ULTRAFILTRATION CHARACTERISTICS OF OIL-DETERGENT-WATER SYSTEMS - MEMBRANE FOULING MECHANISMS [J].
BHATTACHARYYA, D ;
JUMAWAN, AB ;
GRIEVES, RB ;
HARRIS, LR .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1979, 14 (06) :529-549
[4]   The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment [J].
Carroll, T ;
King, S ;
Gray, SR ;
Bolto, BA ;
Booker, NA .
WATER RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (11) :2861-2868
[5]  
Chang YJ, 1996, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V88, P74
[6]   Isolation of humic and non-humic NOM fractions: Structural characterizations [J].
Croué J.-P. .
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2004, 92 (1-3) :193-207
[7]   Interactions of hydrophobically modified polyelectrolytes with surfactants of the same charge [J].
Deo, P ;
Jockusch, S ;
Ottaviani, MF ;
Moscatelli, A ;
Turro, NJ ;
Somasundaran, P .
LANGMUIR, 2003, 19 (26) :10747-10752
[8]   Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes [J].
Fan, LH ;
Harris, JL ;
Roddick, FA ;
Booker, NA .
WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (18) :4455-4463
[9]   THE EFFECT OF SURFACTANT PRETREATMENT ON THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEINS [J].
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
KIM, KJ .
DESALINATION, 1985, 53 (1-3) :37-55
[10]   A review of the impact of chemical pretreatment on low-pressure water treatment membranes [J].
Farahbakhsh, K ;
Svrcek, C ;
Guest, RK ;
Smith, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2004, 3 (04) :237-253