Dimensions of community attachment and their relationship to well-being in the amenity-rich rural west

被引:124
作者
Brehm, JM [1 ]
Eisenhauer, BW
Krannich, RS
机构
[1] Illinois State Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Normal, IL 61790 USA
[2] Plymouth State Univ, Dept Social Sci, Plymouth, NH 03264 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Dept Sociol Anthropol & Social Work, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1526/0036011041730545
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This research had two primary objectives: 1) to broaden the sociological construct of community attachment to incorporate both social and natural environment dimensions of attachment, and 2) to examine how variations in attachment relate to two dimensions of well-being in natural amenity-rich rural communities. The specific dimensions of well-being measured are two important factors identified in previous research-collective action and perceptions of open communication. Factor analysis of fourteen measures of attachment indicated social attachment and attachment to the natural environment are distinct dimensions of the broader concept of community attachment. Participation in collective action and perceptions of open communication within a respondent's community explained only a small portion of the variance in levels of both social and natural environment attachment. Religious affiliation and length of residence were strongly associated with social attachment, supporting findings from previous empirical work. However, length of residence and religious affiliation were not statistically associated with levels of attachment to the natural environment, further reinforcing the distinction between the two dimensions of attachment.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 429
页数:25
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STAT COUNT QUICK FAC
[2]   The identification of recreational counties in nonmetropolitan areas of the USA [J].
Beale, CL ;
Johnson, KM .
POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 1998, 17 (01) :37-53
[3]  
Beckley TM, 2003, US FOR SERV T R PNW, V566, P105
[4]  
Beggs JJ, 1996, RURAL SOCIOL, V61, P407, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00626.x
[5]  
BLAHNA DJ, 1985, THESIS U MICHIGAN
[6]   YOUR PLACE OR MINE - THE EFFECT OF PLACE CREATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES AND LANDSCAPE MEANINGS [J].
BRANDENBURG, AM ;
CARROLL, MS .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1995, 8 (05) :381-398
[7]  
Campbell A., 1981, The Sense of Well-Being in America
[8]   Place as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda [J].
Cheng, AS ;
Kruger, LE ;
Daniels, SE .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2003, 16 (02) :87-104
[9]  
CROMARTIE JB, 1998, RURAL DEV PERSPECTIV, V14, P2
[10]  
Cross JE, 2001, THESIS U CALIFORNIA