Comparative life cycle assessment of various ammonia production methods

被引:289
作者
Bicer, Yusuf [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ]
Zamfirescu, Calin [1 ]
Vezina, Greg [2 ]
Raso, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Inst Technol, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Hydrofuel Inc, 1240 Eglinton Ave W, Mississauga, ON L5V 0B6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ammonia; Hydrogen; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Efficiency; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
In the present study, four different ammonia production methods are comparatively evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA). The proposed ammonia production systems consist of an electrolyzer for hydrogen production and a Haber-Bosch plant for ammonia synthesis. The required energy for the systems are utilized from various resources namely hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste. Life cycle assessment methodology is used to identify and quantify environmental impacts in global warming potential, human toxicity and abiotic depletion categories of each method during the life cycle of the systems. The proposed non-conventional ammonia production options are comparatively assessed in terms of environmental impacts and both energy and exergy efficiencies as significant criteria for practical ammonia production applications. The LCA results for the ammonia production processes indicate that municipal waste incineration plant and hydropower based ammonia production methods have lower environmental impacts than other selected methods. The predicted greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) of hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste based ammonia production methods are calculated as 0.38 kg CO2-eq, 0.84 kg CO2-eq, 0.85 kg CO2-eq and 0.34 kg CO2-eq per kg of ammonia, respectively. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the systems are comparatively evaluated and as an indicator of improvement potential, sustainability index values are calculated accordingly. The energy efficiencies of the proposed ammonia production methods are determined to be 42.7%, 23.8%, 15.4% and 11.7%, respectively for hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste based options. The corresponding exergy efficiencies are found to be 46.4%, 20.4%, 15.5% and 10.3%, respectively for hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste based options. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1395
页数:17
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Acero AitorP., 2014, Impact Assessment Methods in Life Cycle Assessment and their Impact Categories
[2]
From long-term targets to cumulative emission pathways: Reframing UK climate policy [J].
Anderson, Kevin ;
Bows, Alice ;
Mander, Sarah .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) :3714-3722
[3]
Baayen H., 2000, ECOINDICATOR 99 DAMA
[4]
Bartels J.R., 2008, FEASIBILITY STUDY IM
[5]
Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production [J].
Boyano, A. ;
Blanco-Marigorta, A. M. ;
Morosuk, T. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) :2202-2214
[6]
Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods [J].
Cetinkaya, E. ;
Dincer, I. ;
Naterer, G. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (03) :2071-2080
[7]
Dincer I, 2013, EXERGY ENERGY ENV SU
[8]
Ammonia production via a two-step Al2O3/AlN thermochemical cycle.: 1.: Thermodynamic, environmental, and economic analyses [J].
Galvez, M. E. ;
Halmann, M. ;
Steinfeld, A. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (07) :2042-2046
[9]
Ganley J., 2007, AMM SUST EM FREE FUE
[10]
Gilbert P., 2010, BIOT C BRIM