Constitutionalism and experimentalist governance

被引：21

作者：

Kumm, Mattias ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] WZB, Social Sci Res Ctr, Wissensch Zentrum Berlin, D-10785 Berlin, Germany

[2] NYU, Sch Law, New York, NY 10003 USA

来源：

REGULATION & GOVERNANCE | 2012年 / 6卷 / 03期

关键词：

constitutionalism; directly deliberative polyarchy; European constitutionalism; experimentalist governance; liberal democracy;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01154.x

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This comment explores how experimentalist governance is connected to wider constitutional questions and makes two claims. First, there are good reasons to believe that experimentalist governance can only flourish in a world where the precepts of liberal democratic constitutionalism have been widely accepted and institutionalized. Experimentalist governance is part and parcel of the world of liberal democratic constitutionalism. Second, it is not only governance in Europe that can be described in experimentalist terms. The concept is also useful to describe the dynamics of European constitutionalism.

引用

页码：401 / 409

页数：9

共 12 条

[1]

Avbelj M., Komarek J., Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, (2012)

[2]

Cohen J., Sabel C.F., Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy, European Law Journal, 3, pp. 313-342, (1997)

[3]

Dorf M., Sabel C.F., A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism, Columbia Law Review, 98, pp. 267-473, (1998)

[4]

Kumm M., Constitutionalizing Subsidiarity in Integrated Markets: The Case of Tobacco Regulation in the European Union, European Law Journal, 12, pp. 503-533, (2006)

[5]

Kumm M., Why Europeans Will Not Embrace Constitutional Patriotism, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6, pp. 117-136, (2008)

[6]

Kumm M., Ferreres Comella V., The Primacy Clause of the Constitutional Treaty and the Future of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, pp. 473-492, (2005)

[7]

Payandeh M., Constitutional Review of EU Law after Honeywell: Contextualizing the Relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice, Common Market Law Review, 48, pp. 9-38, (2011)

[8]

Pildes R.H., Anderson E.S., Expressive Theories of the Law: A General Restatement, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148, pp. 1503-1575, (2000)

[9]

Sabel C.F., Gerstenberg O., Constitutionalizing an Overlapping Consensus: The ECJ and the Emergence of a Coordinate Constitutional Order, European Law Journal, 16, pp. 511-550, (2010)

[10]

Sabel C.F., Zeitlin J., Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, (2010)

← 1 2 →