The SED-TOX index: Toxicity-directed management tool to assess and rank sediments based on their hazard - Concept and application

被引:39
作者
Bombardier, M [1 ]
Bermingham, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Environm Canada, St Lawrence Ctr, Montreal, PQ H2Y 2E7, Canada
关键词
sediments; toxicity tests; exposure phases; hazard; index;
D O I
10.1002/etc.5620180415
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article introduces the Sediment Toxicity (SED-TOX) Index for the assessment and ranking of toxic hazards in sediment. Major features include expression of toxicity responses on a single scale of measurement (dry weight-based toxic units), consideration of multiple routes of exposure (pore water, organic extract, wet sediment, and whole sediment), application of differential treatments to toxicity data depending on the level of response (acute lethal or chronic sublethal), and use of weighting factors to discriminate sediment exposure phases and effect endpoints on the basis of sensitivity. A battery of seven bioassays with four test species (Vibrio fischeri, Escherichia coli, Lytechinus pictus, and Amphiporeia virginiana) was conducted on 49 marine sediment samples collected from six sites at Anse-a-Beaufils and Cap-aux-Meules, which are in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. The SED-TOX scores were calculated for each sampling station and compared with sediment contaminant concentrations. Results indicate that physicochemical characterization is not sufficient to assess contaminated-sediment hazard for organisms; furthermore, using several exposure phases and test species belonging to various trophic levels increases the possibility of correctly identifying toxic sediments. The results of this study indicate that the SED-TOX approach is valuable as a toxicity assessment and ranking tool for sediments. It could easily be combined with other measures of ecosystem disturbance to discriminate between polluted and unpolluted sites.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 698
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ANKLEY GT, 1991, ARCH ENV CONTAM TOXI, V27, P507
[2]  
[Anonymous], EPA503891001
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT US GUID
[4]   COMPARISONS BETWEEN SEDIMENT BIOASSAYS AND ALTERATIONS OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES AT A MARINE SUPERFUND SITE - COMMENCEMENT BAY, WASHINGTON [J].
BECKER, DS ;
BILYARD, GR ;
GINN, TC .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1990, 9 (05) :669-685
[5]  
Burton GA, 1996, J GREAT LAKES RES, V22, P495
[6]   COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CONDUCTING MARINE AND ESTUARINE SEDIMENT POREWATER TOXICITY TESTS - EXTRACTION, STORAGE, AND HANDLING TECHNIQUES [J].
CARR, RS ;
CHAPMAN, DC .
ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 28 (01) :69-77
[8]   DO SEDIMENT TOXICITY TESTS REQUIRE FIELD VALIDATION [J].
CHAPMAN, PM .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1995, 14 (09) :1451-1453
[9]  
Cook Nancy H., 1996, Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, V31, P673
[10]   POTENTIAL ECOTOXIC EFFECTS PROBE (PEEP) - A NOVEL INDEX TO ASSESS AND COMPARE THE TOXIC POTENTIAL OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS [J].
COSTAN, G ;
BERMINGHAM, N ;
BLAISE, C ;
FERARD, JF .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND WATER QUALITY, 1993, 8 (02) :115-140