The use of trajectory cluster analysis to examine the long-range transport of secondary inorganic aerosol in the UK

被引:127
作者
Abdalmogith, SS [1 ]
Harrison, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Div Environm Hlth & Risk Management, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
back trajectory; clustering; sulphate; nitrate; chloride;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.059
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The influence of synoptic-scale atmospheric transport patterns on observed levels of sulphate, nitrate and PM10 at Belfast (urban) and Harwell (rural) has been examined. Three-day 6-hourly back trajectories for January 2002 to December 2003, arriving at the two sampling locations at 1200 GMT and 900 hPa were calculated. A K-means clustering algorithm is used to group these trajectories into 10 clusters depending on their direction and speed. Nonparametric statistics were used to test for significant differences in mean aerosol concentration across clusters. Significant inter-cluster differences were observed with highest nitrate and sulphate levels associated with south-easterly and easterly trajectory clusters at Belfast and Harwell respectively, and highest chloride concentrations associated with fast moving maritime trajectory categories at both sites. Easterly trajectory clusters show lower sulphate/nitrate ratios compared to other clusters, especially for air travelling from the near continent. Nitrate shows greater episodicity than 3 sulphate with implications for achievement of the daily PM10 limit value of 50 mu g m(-3). Our trajectory analysis suggests that control of NOx emissions from the UK and adjacent continental European countries has a major role to play in achieving compliance with the current PM10 limit value. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6686 / 6695
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SOURC APP AIRB PART
[2]  
[Anonymous], PART MATT UK AIR QUA
[3]   A trajectory-clustering-correlation methodology for examining the long-range transport of air pollutants [J].
Brankov, E ;
Rao, ST ;
Porter, PS .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (09) :1525-1534
[4]   The influence of weather-type and long-range transport on airborne particle concentrations in Edinburgh, UK [J].
Buchanan, CM ;
Beverland, IJ ;
Heal, MR .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (34) :5343-5354
[5]   The use of trajectory cluster analysis to interpret trace gas measurements at Mace Head, Ireland [J].
Cape, JN ;
Methven, J ;
Hudson, LE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (22) :3651-3663
[6]   Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments [J].
Charron, A ;
Harrison, RM ;
Moorcroft, S ;
Booker, J .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (03) :415-423
[7]  
Draxler R., 1997, ARL224 NOAA ERL
[8]  
Draxler RR, 1998, AUST METEOROL MAG, V47, P295
[9]   Sources of fine particulate sulfate in New York [J].
Dutkiewicz, VA ;
Qureshi, S ;
Khan, AR ;
Ferraro, V ;
Schwab, J ;
Demerjian, K ;
Husain, L .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (20) :3179-3189
[10]  
Dutton J.A., 1986, The ceaseless wind: An introduction to the theory of atmospheric motion