Does Fusion Status Correlate with Patient Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Fusion?

被引:38
作者
Djurasovic, Mladen [1 ,2 ]
Glassman, Steven D. [1 ,2 ]
Dimar, John R., II [1 ,2 ]
Howard, Jennifer M. [1 ,2 ]
Bratcher, Kelly R. [1 ]
Carreon, Leah Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norton Leatherman Spine Ctr, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
lumbar fusion; clinical outcomes; HRQOL; pseudoarthrosis; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; SURGICAL EXPLORATION; LONG-TERM; ARTHRODESIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fde2c4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. Prospective cohort. Objectives. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between radiographic fusion and patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have shown that a solid fusion does not always produce clinical success. However, these studies did not use validated patient-reported HRQOL measures. Methods. One hundred ninety-three patients who underwent instrumented posterolateral fusion with complete preoperative and 2-year HRQOL measures and a fine-cut computed tomographic (CT) scan with reconstructions done at 2 years after surgery specifically done to assess fusion status were identified. HRQOL measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Short Form-36 and back and leg pain numerical rating scales. The percentage of patients reaching the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit for ODI and Short Form-36 were also calculated. CT scans were graded as fused or not by three independent reviewers. Comparisons were made in outcomes measures between the patients with solid fusions and those judged not to have a solid radiographic fusion. Results. There were 124 women and 69 men with an average age of 63 years. Patients judged to have a solid fusion demonstrated a better ODI score at 2 years than those who were not solidly fused (P = 0.023). There was a trend toward greater improvement in mean ODI score in those with a solid fusion (P = 0.074). A statistically greater number of patients who had a solid fusion (111 of 171, 65%) achieved the minimum clinically important difference for ODI than those who did not achieve a solid fusion (7 of 22, 32%) (P = 0.004). Conclusion. A greater proportion of patients achieved clinically relevant improvements in low back specific quality-of-life measures when they had achieved a solid fusion than patients who did not have a solid fusion. Although radiographic fusion may not be the true measure of clinical success, this study suggests that solid arthrodesis contributes to clinical outcome and is an important goal of fusion surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 409
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
[Anonymous], SPINE
[2]
CAN LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHS ACCURATELY DETERMINE FUSION IN POSTOPERATIVE-PATIENTS - CORRELATION OF ROUTINE RADIOGRAPHS WITH A 2ND SURGICAL LOOK AT LUMBAR FUSIONS [J].
BLUMENTHAL, SL ;
GILL, K .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (09) :1186-1189
[3]
THE ROLE OF FUSION AND INSTRUMENTATION IN THE TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS WITH SPINAL STENOSIS [J].
BRIDWELL, KH ;
SEDGEWICK, TA ;
OBRIEN, MF ;
LENKE, LG ;
BALDUS, C .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1993, 6 (06) :461-472
[4]
Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Djurasovic, Mladen .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (01) :39-43
[5]
Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Djurasovic, Mladen ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Sailer, Philip .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (08) :892-895
[6]
Quantitative analysis in outcome assessment of instrumented lumbosacral arthrodesis [J].
Champain, Sabina ;
Mazel, Christian ;
Mitulescu, Anca ;
Skalli, Wafa .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (08) :1241-1249
[7]
Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Schuler, Thomas C. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) :968-974
[8]
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Schuler, Thomas C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) :541-546
[9]
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life [J].
Crosby, RD ;
Kolotkin, RL ;
Williams, GR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) :395-407
[10]
Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 on an Absorbable Collagen Sponge with an Osteoconductive Bulking Agent in Posterolateral Arthrodesis with Instrumentation A Prospective Randomized Trial [J].
Dawson, Edgar ;
Bae, Hyun W. ;
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Stambough, Jeffery L. ;
Glassman, Steven D. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (07) :1604-1613