Moody's investors service response to the consultative paper issued by the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision "A new capital adequacy framework"

被引:45
作者
Cantor, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Moodys Investors Serv, New York, NY 10007 USA
关键词
capital regulation; capital adequacy; external ratings;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4266(00)00121-7
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Moody's endorses the Basel Committee's proposal to use banks' internal risk assessments to refine the Basel Accords risk weights on bank assets and commitments. External risk assessments, such as Moodys credit ratings, will likely play a supporting role as direct inputs into banks' internal rating systems and as tools for benchmarking and validating those systems. However, the widespread use of ratings in regulation threatens to undermine the quality of credit over time by increasing rating shopping, decreasing rating agency independence, and reducing incentives to innovate and improve the quality of ratings. This paper discusses how bank regulators can use external ratings in ways that mitigate the adverse incentives created by the resulting regulatory demand for rating agency services. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V, All rights reserved. JEL classification: G11; G20, G31; G33.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 185
页数:15
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] BEATTIE V, 1992, J INT SECURITIES MAR, V167
  • [2] CANTOR R, 1997, J BANKING FINANCE, V21
  • [3] 1998, WHITE PAPER MOODYS R
  • [4] 1999, EVOLVING MEANING MOO
  • [5] 2000, HIST DEFAULT RATES C