Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community

被引:140
作者
Fuh, JL [1 ]
Wang, SJ
Lu, SR
Juang, KD
Lee, SJ
机构
[1] Vet Gen Hosp, Neurol Inst, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
cross-cultural comparisons; health-related quality of life; SF-36 health survey; Taiwan; women;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008993821633
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To test the psychometric properties of the Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the short form 36 health survey (SF-36), 1439 women, aged 40-54 years and living in Kinmen (a Taiwanese island reflecting a predominantly rural community) were recruited to participate in this survey. The rate of unavailable data points for the 36 tested items remained consistently low, and item-discriminate validity was high (95%) for all subscales. Cronbach's alpha coefficient remained above the 0.70 threshold criterion for all scales except for social functioning and bodily pain. Principal components analysis supported the two major dimensions of health, physical and mental, in the internal structure of the SF-36 scales, although the dimensions did not match the hypothesized association very well. Poorer health profiles were associated with physical and mental conditions. The mental health subscores in the SF-36 test correlated highly with the associated hospital anxiety and depression score (Spearman rank correlation coefficient = -0.62). In conclusion, the reliability and validity tests performed on the data collected support the cross-cultural application of the Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 test.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 683
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries:: Results from the IQOLA Project [J].
Gandek, B ;
Ware, JE ;
Aaronson, NK ;
Alonso, J ;
Apolone, G ;
Bjorner, J ;
Brazier, J ;
Bullinger, M ;
Fukuhara, S ;
Kaasa, S ;
Leplège, A ;
Sullivan, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1149-1158
[2]  
Hays R., 1988, USERS GUIDE MULTITRA
[3]   CRITERION VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 IN A POPULATION-SAMPLE [J].
JENKINSON, C ;
WRIGHT, L ;
COULTER, A .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (01) :7-12
[4]  
JUANG KD, 1999, CHIN MED J TAIPEI, V62, P749
[5]   Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey [J].
Lam, CLK ;
Gandek, B ;
Ren, XHS ;
Chan, MS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1139-1147
[6]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .2. PSYCHOMETRIC AND CLINICAL-TESTS OF VALIDITY IN MEASURING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL-HEALTH CONSTRUCTS [J].
MCHORNEY, CA ;
WARE, JE ;
RACZEK, AE .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (03) :247-263
[7]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .3. TESTS OF DATA QUALITY, SCALING ASSUMPTIONS, AND RELIABILITY ACROSS DIVERSE PATIENT GROUPS [J].
MCHORNEY, CA ;
WARE, JE ;
LU, JFR ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (01) :40-66
[8]  
Moore R, 1998, Anesth Prog, V45, P22
[9]  
Nunnally JC., 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, V2nd ed
[10]   The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: Results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg [J].
Persson, LO ;
Karlsson, J ;
Bengtsson, C ;
Steen, B ;
Sullivan, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1095-1103