Patient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim

被引:113
作者
Doward, Lynda C. [1 ]
Gnanasakthy, Ari
Baker, Mary G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Galen Res Ltd, Manchester M15 6SE, Lancs, England
[2] Fondat Univ, European Brain Council, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PHYSICIAN; ASSESSMENTS; INSTRUMENT; TAXONOMY; GUIDANCE; RATINGS;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-8-89
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The use of patient reported outcome scales in clinical trials conducted by the pharmaceutical industry has become more widespread in recent years. The use of such outcomes is particularly common for products developed to treat chronic, disabling conditions where the intention is not to cure but to ameliorate symptoms, facilitate functioning or, ultimately, to improve quality of life. In such cases, patient reported evidence is increasingly viewed as an essential complement to traditional clinical evidence for establishing a product's competitive advantage in the marketplace. In a commercial setting, the value of patient reported outcomes is viewed largely in terms of their potential for securing a labelling claim in the USA or inclusion in the summary of product characteristics in Europe. Although, the publication of the recent US Food and Drug Administration guidance makes it difficult for companies to make claims in the USA beyond symptom improvements, the value of these outcomes goes beyond satisfying requirements for a label claim. The European regulatory authorities, payers both in the US and Europe, clinicians and patients all play a part in determining both the availability and the pricing of medicinal products and all have an interest in patient-reported data that go beyond just symptoms. The purpose of the current paper is to highlight the potential added value of patient reported outcome data currently collected and held by the industry for these groups.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
ABBOTT CA, 1994, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V33, P1060
[2]   Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001 [J].
Acquadro, C ;
Berzon, R ;
Dubois, D ;
Leidy, NK ;
Marquis, P ;
Revicki, D ;
Rothman, M .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (05) :522-531
[3]  
*AD HOC COMM MED E, 1984, ANN INTERN MED, V101, P129
[4]  
[Anonymous], The On-Line Guide to Quality of Life Assessment -
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1980, PROBABILISTIC MODELS
[6]  
[Anonymous], Patient-reported outcome and quality of life instruments database
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, International classification of functioning, disability and health
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps
[9]   The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company [J].
Arpinelli, Fabio ;
Bamfi, Francesco .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2006, 4 (1)
[10]   The development of health technology assessment [J].
Banta, D .
HEALTH POLICY, 2003, 63 (02) :121-132