Modelling ecological expertise for forest planning calculations-rationale, examples, and pitfalls

被引:35
作者
Kangas, J
Leskinen, P
机构
[1] Joenssuu Res Ctr, Finnish Forest Res Inst, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
[2] UPM Kymmene Forest, FIN-37601 Valkeakoski, Finland
关键词
biodiversity; Delphi technique; expert judgment; forest planning; multi-objective optimisation; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Modern forestry increasingly often requires consideration of ecological objectives in planning calculations. A common problem in the integration of ecological objectives with forest planning is the lack of empirical models usable when evaluating the ecological merits of alternative forest treatment schedules. With respect to the habitat requirements of a threatened species, for example, the information might only be descriptive and scattered in numerous different case studies not directly exploitable with the forest area in question. A natural approach to alleviate these problems is to use existing ecological expertise in the form of expert judgments. This paper considers different possibilities for utilising ecological expertise in multi-objective forest planning through some practical examples. Special attention is paid to methodological issues concerning the collection and analysis of expert judgments. It is concluded that the modelling of ecological expertise is a useful tool in forest planning, but the inevitable uncertainties of expert judgments and the special pitfalls in modelling of expertise-as discussed in the paper-should be taken into account. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:9
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Alho J. M., 2001, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, P235
[2]  
Alho JM, 1997, FOREST SCI, V43, P521
[3]  
Alho JM, 1996, J R STAT SOC C-APPL, V45, P1
[4]   Scenarios, uncertainty and conditional forecasts of the world population [J].
Alho, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1997, 160 :71-85
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00045-3
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, J J MULTICRITERIA DE
[7]   Young-stand management options and their implications for wood quality and other values [J].
Barbour, RJ ;
Zaborske, RR ;
McClellan, MH ;
Christian, L ;
Golnick, D .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2005, 72 (1-3) :79-94
[8]   A fuzzy knowledge-based model of population dynamics of the Yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) in a beech forest [J].
Bock, W ;
Salski, A .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1998, 108 (1-3) :155-161
[9]   ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF EXPERT JUDGMENT - ISSUES AND ANALYSIS [J].
BOLGER, F ;
WRIGHT, G .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1994, 11 (01) :1-24
[10]  
BROUWER R, 2003, ECOLOGICAL EC, V50, P1