The role of leadership in shared mental model convergence and team performance improvement An agent-based computational model

被引:91
作者
Dionne, Shelley D. [1 ]
Sayama, Hiroki [2 ]
Hao, Chanyu [1 ]
Bush, Benjamin James [3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Sch Management, Ctr Leadership Studies, Binghamton, NY 13901 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Bioengn, Collect Dynam Complex Syst Res Grp, Binghamton, NY USA
[3] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Syst Sci & Ind Engn, Collect Dynam Complex Syst Res Grp, Binghamton, NY USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Mental model; Leadership; Agent based model; Computer simulation; Social network; MEMBER EXCHANGE; EXTERNAL LEADERSHIP; LEAD; TIES; LMX;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research in shared mental models has Immeasurably aided our understanding of effective teamwork and taskwork However little research has focused on the role that leaders play if any in influencing developing and/or fostering shared mental models and thereby improving team performance We developed an agent-based computational model based on McComb s theory of three-phase mental model development where agents repeatedly share individual opinions (orientation phase) evaluate and respond to the opinions expressed by others (differentiation phase) and modify their understanding of the team based on the responses (integration phase) Leadership and team properties are represented in three experimental parameters social network structure heterogeneity of agents domains of expertise and level of their mutual interest Participative leadership is represented by a fully connected network while Leader-Member exchange (LMX) is represented by a fully connected network of in group members and several out-group members connected only to the leader Our simulation results show that in general participative leadership promotes mental model convergence better than LMX In the meantime the team performance improvement is achieved by participative leadership only when members have both heterogeneous domains of expertise and strong mutual interest In all other conditions participative leadership causes the worst degradation of team performance through team development processes while LMX is the best to minimize such team degradation Implications and suggestions for future research are provided (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1049
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PERSONNEL PSYCHOL HD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Groups that work (and those that don't)
[3]   The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team [J].
Baba, ML ;
Gluesing, J ;
Ratner, H ;
Wagner, KH .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (05) :547-587
[4]   The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership [J].
Balkundi, P ;
Kilduff, M .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2005, 16 (06) :941-961
[5]  
Balkundi P, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P49, DOI [10.2307/20159745, 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500]
[6]   A typology of virtual teams - Implications for effective leadership [J].
Bell, BS ;
Kozlowski, SWJ .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 27 (01) :14-49
[7]  
Binder K., 2002, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics
[8]   Leader-member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes [J].
Boies, Kathleen ;
Howell, Jane M. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2006, 17 (03) :246-257
[9]   A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks [J].
Borgatti, SP ;
Cross, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (04) :432-445
[10]  
Caflisch R. E., 1998, Acta Numerica, V7, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0962492900002804