Can applied science be 'good science'? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience

被引:72
作者
Meyer, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Debackere, K. [1 ,3 ]
Glanzel, W. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr R&D Monitoring, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Sussex, Dept Business & Management, Sch Business Management & Econ, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept MSI, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Nanoscience; Nanotechnology; Patent citations; Citation impact; Science-technology linkage; NANO-SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; COLLABORATION; EXPLORATION; SCIENTISTS; INNOVATION; PATTERNS; LINKAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-009-0154-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
There is a rich literature on how science and technology are related to each other. Patent citation analysis is amongst the most frequently used to tool to track the strengths of links. In this paper we explore the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Our observations indicate that patent-cited papers perform better in terms of standard bibliometric indicators than comparable publications that are not linked to technology in this way. More specifically, we found that articles cited in patents are more likely to be cited also by other papers. The share of highly cited papers is the most striking result. Instead of the average of 4% of all papers, 13.8% of the papers cited once or twice in patents fall into this category and even 23.5% of the papers more frequently cited in patents receive citation rates far above the standard. Our analyses further demonstrate the presence and the relevance of bandwagon effects driving the development of science and technology.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 539
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence [J].
Baldini, Nicola .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 75 (02) :289-311
[2]  
Bassecoulard E, 2004, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND PATENT STATISTICS IN STUDIES OF S&T SYSTEMS, P665
[3]   UNITED GERMANY - THE NEW SCIENTIFIC SUPERPOWER [J].
BRAUN, T ;
GLANZEL, W .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1990, 19 (5-6) :513-521
[4]  
Braun T., 1985, Scientometric indicators:a 32-country comparative evaluation of publishing performance and citation impact
[5]   Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? [J].
Brusoni, S ;
Prencipe, A ;
Pavitt, K .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2001, 46 (04) :597-621
[6]   Patent and publication activities of German professors:: an empirical assessment of their co-activity [J].
Czarnitzki, Dirk ;
Glanzel, Wolfgang ;
Hussinger, Katrin .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2007, 16 (04) :311-319
[7]   Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research [J].
Czarnitzki, Dirk ;
Glanzel, Wolfgang ;
Hussinger, Katrin .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) :26-34
[8]   INSTITUTIONAL VARIATIONS IN PROBLEM CHOICE AND PERSISTENCE AMONG SCIENTISTS IN AN EMERGING FIELD [J].
DEBACKERE, K ;
RAPPA, MA .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1994, 23 (04) :425-441
[9]  
Etzkowitz H., 1997, U GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE E
[10]   University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence [J].
Geuna, Aldo ;
Nesta, Lionel J. J. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (06) :790-807