Sustained-release alfuzosin, finasteride and the combination of both in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

被引:168
作者
Debruyne, FMJ
Jardin, A
Colloi, D
Resel, L
Witjes, WPJ
Delauche-Cavallier, MC
McCarthy, C
Geffriaud-Ricouard, C
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen Hosp, Dept Urol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Hop Bicetre, Dept Urol, Kremlin Bicetre, France
[3] Osped Maggiore, Dept Urol, Lodi, Italy
[4] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Urol, Madrid, Spain
[5] Synthelabo Rech, Paris, France
关键词
benign prostatic hyperplasia; sustained-release alfuzosin; alpha(1)-blockers; finasteride; 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors;
D O I
10.1159/000019706
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the additive benefit of combining an al-blocker and a Sa-reductase inhibitor. Methods: This European, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involved 1.051 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients received sustained release (SR) alfuzosin (n = 358), a selective alpha(1)-blocker given at a dose of 5 mg twice daily without dose titration; finasteride (n = 344), 5 mg once daily, or both drugs (n = 349), for 6 months. Primary efficacy criteria were symptomatic improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score: I-PSS) and maximum flow rate (Q(max)). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Results: Symptomatic improvement was significantly higher from the Ist month of treatment with SR alfuzosin, alone or in combination; mean changes in I-PSS versus baseline at end-point were -6.3 and -6.1, respectively, compared with -5.2 with finasteride alone (SR alfuzosin vs. finasteride, p = 0.01; combination vs. finasteride, p = 0.03). The percentages of patients with a decrease in I-PSS of at least 50% were 43, 42 and 33% for SR alfuzosin, the combination and finasteride, respectively (SR alfuzosin vs. finasteride, p = 0.008; combination vs. finasteride, p = 0.009). In the overall population, increases in Q(max) were greater with SR alfuzosin and the combination, compared with finasteride alone after 1 month of therapy, but changes at end-point were similar in the three treatment groups. In those 47% of patients likely to be obstructed (baseline Q(max) <10 ml/s), however, mean increases in Q(max) were significantly higher with SR alfuzosin, alone or in combination, whatever the visit. Finasteride, alone or in combination, significantly impaired sexual function. The incidence of postural symptoms was low and similar in the three treatment groups. Conclusion: In this 6-month trial, SR alfuzosin was more effective than finasteride, with no additional benefit in combining both drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 175
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abrams P, 1995, P 3 INT CONS BPH MON, P297
[2]   Prostate volume predicts outcome of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with finasteride: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [J].
Boyle, P ;
Gould, AL ;
Roehrborn, CG .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (03) :398-405
[3]   Clinical uroselectivity: Evidence from patients treated with slow-release alfuzosin for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction [J].
Buzelin, JM ;
DelaucheCavallier, MC ;
Roth, S ;
GeffriaudRicouard, C ;
Santoni, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (06) :898-904
[4]  
Buzelin JM, 1997, EUR UROL, V31, P190
[5]   Comparison of tamsulosin with alfuzosin in the treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction (symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia) [J].
Buzelin, JM ;
Fonteyne, E ;
Kontturi, M ;
Witjes, WPJ ;
Khan, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (04) :597-605
[6]  
Carraro JC, 1996, PROSTATE, V29, P231, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(199610)29:4&lt
[7]  
231::AID-PROS4&gt
[8]  
3.0.CO
[9]  
2-E
[10]  
Cockett A.T.K., 1993, P 2 INT CONS BEN PRO, P553