The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care

被引:123
作者
Kost, K [1 ]
Landry, DJ [1 ]
Darroch, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Alan Guttmacher Inst, New York, NY 10005 USA
来源
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES | 1998年 / 30卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2991608
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Context: The planning status of a pregnancy may affect a woman's prenatal behaviors and the health of her newborn. However, whether this effect is independent or is attributable to socioeconomic and demographic factors has not been explored using nationally representative data. Methods: Data were obtained on 9,122 births reported in the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and 2,548 births reported in the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth. Multiple logistic regression analyses were employed to examine the effects of planning status on the odds of a negative birth outcome (premature delivery, low-birth-weight infant or infant who is small for gestational age), early well-baby care and breastfeeding. Results: The proportion of infants born with a health disadvantage is significantly lower if the pregnancy was intended than if it was mistimed or not wanted; the proportions who receive well-baby care by age three months and who are ever breastfed are highest if the pregnancy was intended. In analyses controlling for the mother's background characteristics, however, a mistimed pregnancy has no significant effect on any of these outcomes. An unwanted pregnancy increases the likelihood that the infant's health will be compromised (odds ratio, 1.3), but the association is no longer significant when the mother's prenatal behaviors are also taken into account Unwanted pregnancy has no independent effect on the likelihood of well-baby care, but it reduces the odds of breastfeeding (0.6). Conclusions: Knowing the planning status of a pregnancy can help identify women who may need support to engage in prenatal behaviors that are associated with healthy outcomes and appropriate infant care.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 230
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] MATERNAL WEIGHT-GAIN PATTERN AND BIRTH-WEIGHT
    ABRAMS, B
    SELVIN, S
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (02) : 163 - 169
  • [2] Brown SarahS., 1995, The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families
  • [3] THE EFFECT OF CIGARETTE-SMOKING ON NEONATAL ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS
    CLIVER, SP
    GOLDENBERG, RL
    CUTTER, GR
    HOFFMAN, HJ
    DAVIS, RO
    NELSON, KG
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (04) : 625 - 630
  • [4] WEIGHT GROWTH IN INFANTS BORN TO MOTHERS WHO SMOKED DURING PREGNANCY
    CONTER, V
    CORTINOVIS, I
    ROGARI, P
    RIVA, L
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6982) : 768 - 771
  • [5] Unintended pregnancy and breast-feeding behavior
    Dye, TD
    Wojtowycz, MA
    Aubry, RH
    Quade, J
    Kilburn, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (10) : 1709 - 1711
  • [6] *FOLL SURV BRANCH, 1991, PUBL US DAT TAP DOC
  • [7] EXCESSIVE MATERNAL WEIGHT AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME
    JOHNSON, JWC
    LONGMATE, JA
    FRENTZEN, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (02) : 353 - 372
  • [8] JUDKINS D, 1991, VITAL HLTH STAT, V2
  • [9] RACE, INTERVENING VARIABLES, AND 2 COMPONENTS OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT
    KALLAN, JE
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 1993, 30 (03) : 489 - 506
  • [10] Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: Does intention status matter?
    Kost, K
    Landry, DJ
    Darroch, JE
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 30 (02): : 79 - 88