Personality over time: Methodological approaches to the study of short-term and long-term development and change

被引:55
作者
Biesanz, JC
West, SG
Kwok, OM
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-6494.7106002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although theories of personality emphasize the integrative, enduring, and dynamic nature of personality, the current modal research design in personality ignores the dimension of time. We consider a variety of recent methods of longitudinal data analysis to examine both short-term and long-term development and change in personality, including mean-level analyses both across and within individuals across time, variance structures across time, and cycles and dynamic models across time. These different longitudinal analyses can address classic as well as new questions in the study of personality and its development. We discuss the linkages among different longitudinal analyses, measurement issues in temporal data, the spacing of assessments, and the levels of generalization and potential insights afforded by different longitudinal analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 941
页数:37
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] Adams DC, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P1277, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1277:RTFMAO]2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Alexander VE, 1996, CATEGORICAL VARIABLE
  • [4] Allport G.W., 1933, Studies in expressive movement
  • [5] Allport G. W., 1937, Personality: a psychological interpretation
  • [6] IMPULSIVITY AND TIME OF DAY - IS RATE OF CHANGE IN AROUSAL A FUNCTION OF IMPULSIVITY
    ANDERSON, KJ
    REVELLE, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) : 334 - 344
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1998, CHILDREN GREAT DEPRE
  • [8] [Anonymous], J PERSONALITY
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1966, Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology
  • [10] Stress and alcohol use: A daily process examination of the stressor-vulnerability model
    Armeli, S
    Carney, MA
    Tennen, H
    Affleck, G
    O'Neil, TP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (05) : 979 - 994