Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures

被引:106
作者
Seeman, E [1 ]
Duan, YB [1 ]
Fong, C [1 ]
Edmonds, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Austin & Repatriat Med Ctr, Dept Endocrinol, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
关键词
bone size; volumetric bone mineral density; spine fracture; hip fracture; men;
D O I
10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.1.120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
To study the structural basis of bone fragility in men, we compared bone size and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the third lumbar vertebra and femoral neck in 95 men with spine fractures, 127 men with hip fractures, and 395 healthy controls using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The results were expressed in absolute terms and age-specific SD scores (mean a SEM). In controls, vertebral body and femoral neck width increased across age, being 0.46 +/- 0.11 SD and 0.91 +/- 0.08 SD higher in elderly men than in young men, respectively (both,p < 0.001). Men with spine fractures had reduced vertebral body width (-0.45 +/- 0.10 SD;p < 0.01) but not femoral neck width (-0.15 +/- 0.10 SD, NS). Men with hip fractures had reduced femoral neck width (-0.45 +/- 0.11 SD; p < 0.01) and vertebral body width (-0.25 +/- 0.10 SD; p < 0.05). The deficits in bone volume (BV) exaggerated the deficits in bone mineral content (BMC) by 40% at the vertebrae in men with spine fractures and by 9% at the femoral neck in men with hip fractures, vBMD deficits were greater at the vertebrae in men with spine fractures than in men with hip fractures (-1.37 +/- 0.08 SD vs.-0.70 +/- 0.10 SD, respectively; p < 0.01) but were similar at the femoral neck (-0.93 +/- 0.10 SD and -0.76 +/- 0.11 SD, respectively, NS), despite the men with spine fracture being 10 years younger. Bone fragility leading to spine or hip fractures in men may be the result of fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and vBMD that have their origins in growth, aging, or both.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 127
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
HIP FRACTURE PATIENTS HAVE GENERALIZED OSTEOPENIA WITH A PREFERENTIAL DEFICIT IN THE FEMUR [J].
ALOIA, JF ;
MCGOWAN, D ;
ERENS, E ;
MIELE, G .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 2 (02) :88-93
[2]
The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific [J].
Bass, S ;
Delmas, PD ;
Pearce, G ;
Hendrich, E ;
Tabensky, A ;
Seeman, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1999, 104 (06) :795-804
[3]
SEX-DIFFERENCES IN GEOMETRY OF THE FEMORAL-NECK WITH AGING - A STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS OF BONE-MINERAL DATA [J].
BECK, TJ ;
RUFF, CB ;
SCOTT, WW ;
PLATO, CC ;
TOBIN, JD ;
QUAN, CA .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 50 (01) :24-29
[4]
PREDICTION OF THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF VERTEBRAL BODIES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE BY QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BIGGEMANN, M ;
HILWEG, D ;
BRINCKMANN, P .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 17 (04) :264-269
[5]
BOONEN S, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, P1908
[6]
CARTER DR, 1992, J BONE MINER RES, V7, P137
[7]
Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: Relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry [J].
Cheng, XG ;
Lowet, G ;
Boonen, S ;
Nicholson, PHF ;
Brys, P ;
Nijs, J ;
Dequeker, J .
BONE, 1997, 20 (03) :213-218
[8]
Chevalley T, 1991, Osteoporos Int, V1, P147, DOI 10.1007/BF01625444
[9]
Bone mass in middle-aged osteoporotic men and their relatives: Familial effect [J].
Cohen-Solal, ME ;
Baudoin, C ;
Omouri, M ;
Kuntz, D ;
De Vernejoul, MC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (12) :1909-1914
[10]
CUMMINGS SR, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1429