Prognostic and Predictive Value of Intact and Cleaved Forms of the Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

被引:47
作者
Almasi, Charlotte E. [1 ]
Brasso, Klaus [2 ]
Iversen, Peter [2 ]
Pappot, Helle [3 ]
Hoyer-Hansen, Gunilla
Dano, Keld
Christensen, Ib J.
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Finsen Lab, Copenhagen Bioctr, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Rigshosp, Dept Urol, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
prostate cancer; time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays; uPAR; prognosis; prediction; CELL LUNG-CANCER; PARENTERAL ESTROGEN; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; POLYESTRADIOL PHOSPHATE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; BONE TURNOVER; SURVIVAL; TISSUE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1002/pros.21306
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of different forms of the urokinase receptor, uPAR, in serum from prostate cancer (PC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS. The uPAR forms were measured in samples from 131 metastatic PC patients. These constituted a subset of patients included in a randomized clinical trial of treatment with total androgen blockade (TAB) versus polyestradiol phosphate (PEP). Pre-treatment serum levels of intact uPAR (uPAR(I-III)), intact plus cleaved uPAR (uPAR(I-III) + uPAR(II-III)) and domain I (uPAR(I)) were measured using time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays (TR-FIAs). RESULTS. High serum levels of each of the uPAR forms were significantly associated with short overall survival (OS). The prognostic impact was strongest in the TAB treated patients with all uPAR forms being statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, uPAR (I-III) + uPAR(II-III) was an independent prognostic factor in TAB treated patients (HR = 5.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-10.6, P < 0.0001) but not in PEP treated patients (P = 0.40). In the entire study population, OS was similar in the two treatment groups. The survival analysis showed significant interactions between treatment modality and the level of either uPAR(I-III) or uPAR(I-III) + uPAR(II-III). High levels of uPAR(I-III) + uPAR(II-III) were found to be predictive of effect of PEP versus TAB treatment. Patients with uPAR(I-III) + uPAR(II-III) levels above the median had significantly longer OS (median difference 11.3 months), if treated with PEP rather than with TAB (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-3.1, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION. uPAR forms are significantly associated with OS. High uPAR(I-III) + uPAR(II-III) predicts longer OS in patients treated with PEP compared to TAB. uPAR forms are promising prognostic and predictive markers in PC. Prostate 71: 899-907, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 907
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]
Akimoto S, 1999, PROSTATE, V38, P28, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19990101)38:1<28::AID-PROS3>3.0.CO
[2]
2-M
[3]
Prognostic impact of liberated domain I of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in squamous cell lung cancer tissue [J].
Almasi, CE ;
Hoyer-Hansen, G ;
Christensen, IJ ;
Dano, K ;
Pappot, H .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 48 (03) :349-355
[4]
Prognostic significance of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and its cleaved forms in blood from patients with non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Almasi, Charlotte Elberling ;
Hoyer-Hansen, Gunilla ;
Christensen, Ib Jarle ;
Pappot, Helle .
APMIS, 2009, 117 (10) :755-761
[5]
The plasminogen activation system in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis [J].
Andreasen, PA ;
Egelund, R ;
Petersen, HH .
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2000, 57 (01) :25-40
[6]
[Anonymous], 2006, CANC FACTS FIG
[7]
Prognostic value of PINP, bone alkaline phosphatase, CTX-I, and YKL-40 in patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma [J].
Brasso, K ;
Christensen, IJ ;
Johansen, JS ;
Teisner, B ;
Garnero, P ;
Price, PA ;
Iversen, P .
PROSTATE, 2006, 66 (05) :503-513
[8]
Prostate specific antigen:: A prognostic marker of survival in good prognosis metastatic prostate cancer?: (EORTC 30892) [J].
Collette, L ;
de Reijke, TM ;
Schröder, FH .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (02) :182-189
[9]
ESTROGENS IN THE TREATMENT OF PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
COX, RL ;
CRAWFORD, ED .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (06) :1991-1998
[10]
Role of stromal-epithelial interactions in hormonal responses [J].
Cunha, GR ;
Cooke, PS ;
Kurita, T .
ARCHIVES OF HISTOLOGY AND CYTOLOGY, 2004, 67 (05) :417-434