Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities

被引:709
作者
Bullock, James M. [1 ]
Aronson, James [2 ,3 ]
Newton, Adrian C. [4 ]
Pywell, Richard F. [1 ]
Rey-Benayas, Jose M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[2] CNRS, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, UMR 5175, F-34033 Montpellier, France
[3] Missouri Bot Garden, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Conservat Sci, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[5] Univ Alcala de Henares, Dept Ecol, E-28871 Alcala De Henares, Spain
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; CONSERVATION; WATER; TRAJECTORIES; INDICATORS; LANDSCAPE; RECOVERY; DEFORESTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological restoration is becoming regarded as a major strategy for increasing the provision of ecosystem services as well as reversing biodiversity losses. Here, we show that restoration projects can be effective in enhancing both, but that conflicts can arise, especially if single services are targeted in isolation. Furthermore, recovery of biodiversity and services can be slow and incomplete. Despite this uncertainty, new methods of ecosystem service valuation are suggesting that the economic benefits of restoration can outweigh costs. Payment for Ecosystem Service schemes could therefore provide incentives for restoration, but require development to ensure biodiversity and multiple services are enhanced and the needs of different stakeholders are met. Such approaches must be implemented widely if new global restoration targets are to be achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 549
页数:9
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Agraz-Hernandez C.M., 2007, RESTAURACION CON MAN
[2]   Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities [J].
Anderson, Barbara J. ;
Armsworth, Paul R. ;
Eigenbrod, Felix ;
Thomas, Chris D. ;
Gillings, Simon ;
Heinemeyer, Andreas ;
Roy, David B. ;
Gaston, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 46 (04) :888-896
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SER INT PRIM EC REST
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GLOB BIOD OUTL
[5]   ON THE NEED TO SELECT AN ECOSYSTEM OF REFERENCE, HOWEVER IMPERFECT - A REPLY TO PICKETT AND PARKER [J].
ARONSON, J ;
DHILLION, S ;
LEFLOCH, E .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 1995, 3 (01) :1-3
[6]  
Aronson J., 2007, Restoring natural capital: Science, business, and practice
[7]   Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta-analysis of Recent Papers (2000-2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals [J].
Aronson, James ;
Blignaut, James N. ;
Milton, Suzanne J. ;
Le Maitre, David ;
Esler, Karen J. ;
Limouzin, Amandine ;
Fontaine, Christelle ;
de Wit, Martin P. ;
Mugido, Worship ;
Prinsloo, Philip ;
van der Elst, Leandri ;
Lederer, Ned .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2010, 18 (02) :143-154
[8]   Fifty-five years of soil development in restored freshwater depressional wetlands [J].
Ballantine, Katherine ;
Schneider, Rebecca .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 19 (06) :1467-1480
[9]   Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services [J].
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Pfisterer, Andrea B. ;
Buchmann, Nina ;
He, Jing-Shen ;
Nakashizuka, Tohru ;
Raffaelli, David ;
Schmid, Bernhard .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (10) :1146-1156
[10]   The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank [J].
Bekessy, Sarah A. ;
Wintle, Brendan A. ;
Lindenmayer, David B. ;
Mccarthy, Michael A. ;
Colyvan, Mark ;
Burgman, Mark A. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (03) :151-158