Trading more food: Implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system

被引:141
作者
Schmitz, Christoph [1 ,2 ]
Biewald, Anne [1 ]
Lotze-Campen, Hermann [1 ]
Popp, Alexander [1 ]
Dietrich, Jan Philipp [1 ,3 ]
Bodirsky, Benjamin [1 ,4 ]
Krause, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Weindl, Isabelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Dept Earth Syst Anal, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Social Sci, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Dept Phys, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2012年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
International trade; GHG emissions; Land use model; Land use change; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; CARBON; LIBERALIZATION; DEFORESTATION; PRODUCTIVITY; CLIMATE; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The volume of agricultural trade increased by more than ten times throughout the past six decades and is likely to continue with high rates in the future. Thereby, it largely affects environment and climate. We analyse future trade scenarios covering the period of 2005-2045 by evaluating economic and environmental effects using the global land-use model MAgPIE ("Model of Agricultural Production and its Impact on the Environment"). This is the first trade study using spatially explicit mapping of land use patterns and greenhouse gas emissions. We focus on three scenarios: the reference scenario fixes current trade patterns, the policy scenario follows a historically derived liberalisation pathway, and the liberalisation scenario assumes a path, which ends with full trade liberalisation in 2045. Further trade liberalisation leads to lower global costs of food. Regions with comparative advantages like Latin America for cereals and oil crops and China for livestock products will export more. In contrast, regions like the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia face the highest increases of imports. Deforestation, mainly in Latin America, leads to significant amounts of additional carbon emissions due to trade liberalisation. Non-CO2 emissions will mostly shift to China due to comparative advantages in livestock production and rising livestock demand in the region. Overall, further trade liberalisation leads to higher economic benefits at the expense of environment and climate, if no other regulations are put in place. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 209
页数:21
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Agricultural Research, Productivity, and Food Prices in the Long Run [J].
Alston, Julian M. ;
Beddow, Jason M. ;
Pardey, Philip G. .
SCIENCE, 2009, 325 (5945) :1209-1210
[2]   MORE ON WELFARE GAINS TO DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES FROM LIBERALIZING WORLD FOOD TRADE [J].
ANDERSON, K ;
TYERS, R .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 44 (02) :189-204
[3]   AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT - A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
ANDERSON, K .
WORLD ECONOMY, 1992, 15 (01) :153-171
[4]  
Anderson K., 2010, 1011 CTR INT EC STUD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SPECIAL REPORT EMISS
[6]  
[Anonymous], CONTR WORK GROUP 3 4
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, REF 2006 IPCC GUID N
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EC ANAL LAND USE GLO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INT FOOD POLICY RES
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WORLD DEV IND