A two-stage multi-criteria analysis method for planning renewable energy use and carbon saving

被引:19
作者
Ahmed, Asam [1 ]
Sutrisno, Setiadi Wicaksono [1 ]
You, Siming [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Engn, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Renewable energy; Decision tool; Multi-criteria analysis; Climate change; Energy storage; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DECISION-ANALYSIS; POWER-GENERATION; SYSTEM; HEAT; GASIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2020.117475
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
070201 [理论物理];
摘要
Renewable energy use is critical for achieving climate change goals. It is essential to understand necessary to the priority, capacity, and number of units of renewable energy systems for generation planning. Multi-criteria analysis methods serve as an effective tool for planning renewable energy generation. In this work, a two-stage multi-criteria analysis method was developed to identify the priority and capacities, as well as the numbers of units of renewable energy technologies. Technical (capacity factor and power density), economic (benefit-to-cost ratio), and environmental (carbon dioxide equivalent emission) criteria were considered. The method was applied to plan Glasgow's renewable energy use. It was found that the planned renewable energy use configuration consists of 255 units of wind turbines (3.6 MW each), 23,497 units of solar photovoltaic panels (11 kW each), 2 units of biomass combustion systems (2 MW each), and 3382 units of ground source heat pumps (22.5 kW each) corresponding to an annual carbon footprint of 109,629 tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the impacts of weightings in technical, economic, and environmental criteria on the decision in the configuration of renewable energy use. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]
Sustainable energy system design with distributed renewable resources considering economic, environmental and uncertainty aspects [J].
Abdullah, M. A. ;
Muttaqi, K. M. ;
Agalgaonkar, A. P. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 78 :165-172
[2]
Agency I.E., EN TECHN PERSP ANN H
[3]
A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia [J].
Al Garni, Hassan ;
Kassem, Abdulrahman ;
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Komljenovic, Dragan ;
Al-Haddad, Kamal .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2016, 16 :137-150
[4]
Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations [J].
Amponsah, Nana Yaw ;
Troldborg, Mads ;
Kington, Bethany ;
Aalders, Inge ;
Hough, Rupert Lloyd .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :461-475
[5]
[Anonymous], 2018, REN POW GEN COSTS 20
[6]
[Anonymous], 2011, 2020 ROUT REN EN SCO
[7]
[Anonymous], 1998, Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems
[8]
[Anonymous], 2008, Sustainable Energy-Without the Hot Air Internet
[9]
A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Waste Treatment Options for Food and Biodegradable Waste Management in Japan [J].
Babalola, Micky A. .
ENVIRONMENTS, 2015, 2 (04) :471-488
[10]
Hybrid renewable energy systems for power generation in stand-alone applications: A review [J].
Bajpai, Prabodh ;
Dash, Vaishalee .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (05) :2926-2939