共 25 条
European multicenter evaluation of commercial enzyme immunoassays for detecting norovirus antigen in fecal samples
被引:65
作者:
Gray, Jim J.
Kohli, Evelyne
Ruggeri, Franco M.
Vennema, Harry
Sanchez-Fauquier, Alicia
Schreier, Eckart
Gallimore, Chris I.
Iturriza-Gomara, Miren
Giraudon, Helene
Pothier, Pierre
Di Bartolo, Ilaria
Inglese, Nadia
de Bruin, Erwin
van der Veer, Bas
Moreno, Silvia
Montero, Vanessa
de Llano, Mari C.
Hoehne, Marina
Diedrich, Sabine M.
机构:
[1] Hlth Protect Agcy, Ctr Infect, Virus Reference Dept, Enter Virus Unit, London NW9 5HT, England
[2] CHU Brocage, Virol Lab, F-21034 Dijon, France
[3] Ist Super Sanita, Dipartimento Sanita Alimentare & Anim, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[4] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Diagnost Lab Infect Dis & Perinatal Screening, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[5] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Nacl Microbiol, Madrid, Spain
[6] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Mol Epidemiol Viral Pathogens, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词:
D O I:
10.1128/CVI.00214-07
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
A total of 2,254 fecal samples were tested in a European multicenter evaluation of commercially available norovirus antigen detection assays. Two commercial enzyme immunoassays, IDEIA Norovirus (Oxoid; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ely, United Kingdom) and RIDASCREEN Norovirus (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany), were included in the evaluation, and their performance was compared with the results of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Included in the evaluation were samples collected in sporadic cases of gastroenteritis, samples from outbreaks in which two or more samples were collected, well-characterized samples representing genotypes currently cocirculating within Europe, and samples collected from patients with gastroenteritis caused by a pathogen other than norovirus. The sensitivities and specificities of the IDEIA Norovirus and RIDASCREEN Norovirus assays were 58.93 and 43.81% and 93.91 and 96.37%, respectively, compared with RT-PCR. The sensitivities of both assays for outbreak investigations improved when six or more samples from an outbreak were examined. The IDEIA Norovirus assay exhibited reactivity to a broader range of norovirus genotypes than the RIDASCREEN Norovirus assay, which showed genotype-dependent sensitivities. The results indicate that, if used, these assays should serve as screening assays and the results should be confirmed by RT-PCR.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1355
页数:7
相关论文