Survival and recurrent disease after postoperative radiotherapy for early endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:80
作者
Johnson, N. [1 ]
Cornes, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal United Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
关键词
clinical trial; disease-free interval; endometrial cancer; meta-analysis; radiotherapy; randomised trial; survival; uterine cancer; systematic review;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01332.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To clarify the effect of postoperative (adjuvant) external-beam pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT) for different grades of early endometrial cancer. Search strategy Meta-analysis of data from randomised trials stratified by histological risk factors supported by cohort studies. Selection criteria Cochrane methodology. Data Seven randomised trials were identified. Five were eligible for meta-analysis. Homogeneity was confirmed (I-2 < 25%). Main outcome and measures Survival, site of recurrence and added complications. Main results EBRT after hysterectomy for low-risk disease increases the odds of death (OR for overall survival 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.96). EBRT does not appear to alter survival for intermediate-risk cancers (stage ICG1/2 and IBG3) (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.69-1.35). In contrast, EBRT offers a significant disease-free survival advantage for high-risk cancer (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.07-2.89). The survival advantage benefits one in ten women. The definition of high risk is variable across studies but focuses on ICG3 (deeply invasive, poorly differentiated) tumours. Pelvic EBRT reduces the risk of pelvic recurrent disease in all types of invasive endometrial cancer (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.16-0.44), but local recurrence may respond to salvage treatment. The risk of distant metastasis appears to be increased significantly by prophylactic EBRT (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.07-2.35), but this might be because pelvic relapse in untreated women alters reporting of metastatic disease. Authors' conclusions Adjuvant EBRT should not be used for low- (IA, IBG1) or intermediate-risk (IBG2) cancer, but it is associated with a 10% survival advantage for high-risk (stage ICG3) endometrial cancer. This challenges the role of a staging lymphadenectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1320
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
AALDERS J, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V56, P419
[2]   Intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for Stage IB (FIGO Grade 1, 2) endometrial cancer [J].
Alektiar, KM ;
McKee, A ;
Venkatraman, E ;
McKee, B ;
Zelefsky, MJ ;
Mychalczak, BR ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Barakat, RR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (03) :707-713
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[4]  
*ASTEC, STUD TREATM END CANC
[5]  
BOYD L, 2006, E PUBLICATION, V7
[6]   Endometrial cancer incidence trends in Europe: Underlying determinants and prospects for prevention [J].
Bray, F ;
Silva, ID ;
Moller, H ;
Weiderpass, E .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (05) :1132-1142
[7]   Geographic and temporal variations in cancer of the corpus uteri: Incidence and mortality in pre- and postmenopausal women in Europe [J].
Bray, F ;
Loos, AH ;
Oostindier, M ;
Weiderpass, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 117 (01) :123-131
[8]  
CREASMAN WT, 1987, CANCER, V60, P2035, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+<2035::AID-CNCR2820601515>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-8
[10]   The morbidity of treatment for patients with stage I endometrial cancer:: Results from a randomized trial [J].
Creutzberg, CL ;
van Putten, WLJ ;
Koper, PC ;
Lybeert, MLM ;
Jobsen, JJ ;
Wárlám-Rodenhuis, CC ;
De Winter, KAJ ;
Lutgens, LCHW ;
van den Bergh, ACM ;
van der Steen-Banasik, E ;
Beerman, H ;
van Lent, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1246-1255