A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally

被引:1548
作者
Dagenais, Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Caro, Jaime [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Haldeman, Scott [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Div Orthopaed Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] CAM Res Inst, Irvine, CA USA
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Caro Res, Concord, MA USA
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Neurol, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] So Calif Univ Hlth Sci, Div Res, Whittier, CA USA
关键词
low back pain; cost of illness; economics;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The economic burden of low back pain (LBP) is very large and appears to be growing. It is not possible to impact this burden without understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the research on which these costs are calculated. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of LBP cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Systematic review of the literature. METHODS: Medline was searched to uncover studies about the direct or indirect costs of LBP published in English from 1997 to 2007. Data extracted for each eligible study included study design, population, definition of LBP, methods of estimating costs, year of data, and estimates of direct, indirect, or total costs. Results were synthesized descriptively. RESULTS: The search yielded 147 studies, of which 21 were deemed relevant; 4 other studies and 2 additional abstracts were found by searching reference lists, bringing the total to 27 relevant studies. The studies reported on data from Australia, Belgium, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the United States. Nine studies estimated direct costs only, nine indirect costs only, and nine both direct and indirect costs, from a societal (n = 18) or private insurer (n =9) perspective. Methodology used to derive both direct and indirect cost estimates differed markedly among the studies. Among studies providing a breakdown on direct costs, the largest proportion of direct medical costs for LBP was spent on physical therapy (17%) and inpatient services (17%), followed by pharmacy (13%) and primary care (13%). Among studies providing estimates of total costs, indirect costs resulting from lost work productivity represented a majority of overall costs associated with LBP. Three studies reported that estimates with the friction period approach were 56% lower than with the human capital approach. CONCLUSIONS: Several studies have attempted to estimate the direct, indirect, or total costs associated with LBP in various countries using heterogeneous methodology. Estimates of the economic costs in different countries vary greatly depending on study methodology but by any standards must be considered a substantial burden on society. This review did not identify any studies estimating the total costs of LBP in the United States from a societal perspective. Such studies may be helpful in determining appropriate allocation of health-care resources devoted to this condition. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 20
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Large differences in cost of illness and wellbeing between patients with fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, or ankylosing spondylitis [J].
Boonen, A ;
van den Heuvel, R ;
van Tubergen, A ;
Goossens, M ;
Severens, JL ;
van der Heijde, D ;
van der Linden, S .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 (03) :396-402
[2]
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF LOW-BACK-PAIN AND ITS RELATED MEDICAL-CARE IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
TSUIWU, YJ .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (03) :264-268
[3]
The most expensive medical conditions in America [J].
Druss, BG ;
Marcus, SC ;
Olfson, M ;
Pincus, HA .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (04) :105-111
[4]
Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997 - Results of a follow-up national survey [J].
Eisenberg, DM ;
Davis, RB ;
Ettner, SL ;
Appel, S ;
Wilkey, S ;
van Rompay, M ;
Kessler, RC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (18) :1569-1575
[5]
Burden of illness of chronic low back pain in Sweden a cross-sectional, retrospective study in primary care setting [J].
Ekman, M ;
Jönhagen, S ;
Hunsche, E ;
Jönsson, L .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (15) :1777-1785
[6]
The economic cost of low back pain in Sweden in 2001 [J].
Ekman, M ;
Johnell, O ;
Lidgren, L .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2005, 76 (02) :275-284
[7]
FRYMOYER JW, 1991, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V22, P263
[8]
The health and productivity cost burden of the "top 10" physical and mental health conditions affecting six large US employers in 1999 [J].
Goetzel, RZ ;
Hawkins, K ;
Ozminkowski, RJ ;
Wang, SH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2003, 45 (01) :5-14
[9]
Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays [J].
Guo, HR ;
Tanaka, S ;
Halperin, WE ;
Cameron, LL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (07) :1029-1035
[10]
The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of Swedish patients [J].
Hansson, EK ;
Hansson, TH .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (04) :337-345