Measuring the competitiveness of container ports: logisticians' perspectives

被引:49
作者
Yeo, Gi-Tae [2 ]
Roe, Michael [3 ]
Dinwoodie, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Int Shipping & Logist Grp, Sch Business, Sch Management, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[2] Univ Incheon, Grad Sch Logist, Inchon, South Korea
[3] Univ Plymouth, Int Logist & Supply Chain Management Res Grp, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Competitive strategy; Containers; Distribution management; EFFICIENCY; CREATION; IMPACT; CHINA;
D O I
10.1108/03090561111107276
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present an approach to measuring container port competitiveness, a key but neglected element of channel management in a complex and dynamic logistics environment underpinned by commercial confidence and trust in European supply chains fed with goods from container ports in Northeast Asia. Design/methodology/approach - This study applies a fuzzy methodology to measure port competitiveness based on the expert judgements of logisticians. It applies a trapezoidal fuzzy number to measure their perceptions. The method accepts a linguistic expression of their judgements of five of the world's top six container ports in terms of container through-puts, including Hong Kong, Busan, Shanghai, Kaohsuing, Shenzhen. Qindao ranked 16th and Tokyo ranked 20th were also analyzed. Findings - Hong Kong achieved the highest score on port service but on hinterland conditions Shanghai scored highest and Busan the lowest. Hong Kong topped the ratings on the availability factor and the convenience factor, but scored the lowest on logistics cost. Originality/value - This research reports the factors which influence container port competitiveness in Northeast Asia and provides a structure for measuring them. The approach offers a unique insight for stakeholders and logisticians seeking to develop more effective channel management strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 470
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, P 9 WORLD C TRANSP R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic
[3]   A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports [J].
Bichou, K ;
Gray, R .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 39 (01) :75-92
[4]  
Bourlakis C, 2005, J BUS IND MARK, V20, P88, DOI 10.1108/08858620510583687
[5]  
Chang S.E., 2000, J TRANSPORT GEOGR, V8, P53
[6]   A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management [J].
Chen, CT ;
Lin, CT ;
Huang, SF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 102 (02) :289-301
[7]   Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach [J].
Chiou, HK ;
Tzeng, GH ;
Cheng, DC .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (03) :223-234
[8]  
Christopher M., 2006, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V17, P277, DOI [10.1108/09574090610689998, DOI 10.1108/09574090610689998]
[9]  
Containerisation International Yearbook, 2004, CONT INT YB
[10]   Container terminal development in Mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong [J].
Cullinane, K ;
Fei, WT ;
Cullinane, S .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2004, 24 (01) :33-56