Biological indices of soil quality: an ecosystem case study of their use

被引:160
作者
Knoepp, JD
Coleman, DC
Crossley, DA
Clark, JS
机构
[1] Sunder Forest Serv, So Res Stn, Otto, NC 28763 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Inst Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Bot, Durham, NC 27707 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
nitrogen availability; carbon availability; site quality; site productivity; soil chemistry; soil fauna; litter decomposition; forest floor;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00424-2
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Soil quality indices can help ensure that site productivity and soil function are maintained. Biological indices yield evidence of how a soil functions and interacts with the plants, animals and climate that comprise an ecosystem. Soil scientists can identify and quantify both chemical and biological soil-quality indicators for ecosystems with a single main function, such as agricultural lands and forest plantations. However, quantifying these indices in complex ecosystems - that have multiple uses or goals such as maintaining biodiversity, aesthetics, recreation, timber production and water quality - is much more difficult. In an ecosystem context all components - plants, animals and humans - interact with the soil differently, making soil quality indices variable. These interactions result in a combination of biological processes that make each ecosystem unique. We examined the soil and site quality of five forest stands (xeric oak-pine; two mixed hardwood, cove hardwood, northern hardwood), within the 2185-ha Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory. An initial rank of soil quality based on soil chemical and physical properties was assigned. The ranking was then compared with four common groups of soil biological indicators: (1) nitrogen availability; (2) litter decomposition; (3) soil microarthropod populations; and (4) carbon availability. We also examined estimates of overstory productivity, overstory biodiversity and total aboveground productivity for each site as indices of site quality. We found that soil and site quality rankings varied with the indicator, showing that the soil or site of greatest quality may change depending on the use or goal of the ecosystem under examination. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 368
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Abbott I., 1989, P39
[2]   NITROGEN SATURATION IN NORTHERN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS [J].
ABER, JD ;
NADELHOFFER, KJ ;
STEUDLER, P ;
MELILLO, JM .
BIOSCIENCE, 1989, 39 (06) :378-386
[4]  
ANDERSON TH, 1994, BEYOND THE BIOMASS, P67
[5]   APPLICATION OF ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL QUOTIENTS (QCO2 AND QD) ON MICROBIAL BIOMASSES FROM SOILS OF DIFFERENT CROPPING HISTORIES [J].
ANDERSON, TH ;
DOMSCH, KH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1990, 22 (02) :251-255
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta
[7]   EFFECTS OF LITTER QUALITY AND MICROARTHROPODS ON N-DYNAMICS AND RETENTION OF EXOGENOUS N-15 IN DECOMPOSING LITTER [J].
BLAIR, JM ;
CROSSLEY, DA ;
CALLAHAM, LC .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1992, 12 (04) :241-252
[8]   NUTRIENT CYCLING [J].
BORMANN, FH ;
LIKENS, GE .
SCIENCE, 1967, 155 (3761) :424-+
[9]   EFFECTS OF METAL TOXICITY ON THE SIZE OF THE SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS [J].
BROOKES, PC ;
MCGRATH, SP .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1984, 35 (02) :341-346
[10]   THE NATURE OF NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN PLANT-COMMUNITIES [J].
CHAPIN, FS ;
VITOUSEK, PM ;
VANCLEVE, K .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1986, 127 (01) :48-58