The effect of filter material on bioaerosol collection of Bacillus subtilis spores used as a Bacillus anthracis simulant

被引:55
作者
Burton, NC
Adhikari, A
Grinshpun, SA
Hornung, R
Reponen, T
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, NIOSH, Div Surveillance Hazard Evaluat & Field Studies, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Environm Hlth, Ctr Hlth Related Aerosol Studies, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Inst Hlth Policy & Hlth Serv Res, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | 2005年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1039/b500056d
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine filter materials and extraction methods that are appropriate to use for environmental sampling of B. anthracis. Four types of filters were tested: mixed cellulose ester (MCE) with a pore size of 3 μ m, polytetra fluoroethylene ( PTFE) with pore sizes of 1 and 3 μ m, and gelatin with a pore size of 3 μ m. Bacillus subtilis var. niger endospores (also known as Bacillus globigii [BG]) were used as a surrogate for B. anthracis. Endospores were collected into Button Inhalable Aerosol Samplers with sampling times of 15 minutes, 1 hour, and 4 hours. Physical collection efficiency was determined by measuring upstream and downstream B. subtilis concentrations with an optical particle counter. Vortexing with ultrasonic agitation and vortexing with shaker agitation extraction methods were evaluated. The MCE, 1 μ m PTFE, and gelatin filters provided physical collection efficiencies of 94% or greater. The 3 μ m PTFE filter showed inconsistent physical efficiency characteristics between filters. Epifluorescence microscopic analysis of the gelatin filter extraction fluid revealed the presence of contamination by non-culturable bacteria. Mean differences for microbial culturability were not statistically significant for filter materials and extraction methods. However, the vortexing with shaker agitation extraction method resulted in higher total microbial counts in the extraction fluids for MCE and 1 μ m PTFE filters when compared to vortexing with ultrasonic agitation. In summary, the MCE and 1 μ m PTFE filters in combination with vortexing and shaker extraction demonstrated the best performance for the filter collection and extraction of BG spores.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 480
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler [J].
Aizenberg, V ;
Grinshpun, SA ;
Willeke, K ;
Smith, J ;
Baron, PA .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2000, 61 (03) :398-404
[2]   Bioterrorism: An update with a focus on anthrax [J].
Brachman, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 155 (11) :981-987
[3]  
*CDCP, 2002, COMPR PROC COLL ENV
[4]   Bacillus anthracis aerosolization associated with a contaminated mail sorting machine [J].
Dull, PM ;
Wilson, KE ;
Kournikakis, B ;
Whitney, EAS ;
Boulet, CA ;
Ho, JYW ;
Ogston, J ;
Spence, MR ;
Mckenzie, MM ;
Phelan, MA ;
Popovic, T ;
Ashford, D .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 8 (10) :1044-1047
[5]   EVALUATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL AEROSOL SAMPLERS - A REVIEW [J].
HENNINGSON, EW ;
AHLBERG, MS .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1994, 25 (08) :1459-1492
[6]   Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: The first 10 cases reported in the United States [J].
Jernigan, JA ;
Stephens, DS ;
Ashford, DA ;
Omenaca, C ;
Topiel, MS ;
Galbraith, M ;
Tapper, M ;
Fisk, TL ;
Zaki, S ;
Popovic, T ;
Meyer, RF ;
Quinn, CP ;
Harper, SA ;
Fridkin, SK ;
Sejvar, JJ ;
Shepard, CW ;
McConnell, M ;
Guarner, J ;
Shieh, WJ ;
Malecki, JM ;
Gerberding, JL ;
Hughes, JM ;
Perkins, BA .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (06) :933-944
[7]   The adaptation of existing personal inhalable aerosol samplers for bioaerosol sampling [J].
Kenny, LC ;
Stancliffe, JD ;
Crook, B ;
Stagg, S ;
Griffiths, WD ;
Stewart, IW ;
Futter, SJ .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1998, 59 (12) :831-841
[8]  
KOLLER W, 1974, ZBL BAKT MIK HYG B, V159, P546
[9]  
MACHER JM, 1984, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V45, P76, DOI 10.1202/0002-8894(1984)045<0076:PASFMO>2.3.CO
[10]  
2