Sevoflurane provides greater protection of the myocardium than propofol in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

被引:214
作者
Conzen, PF [1 ]
Fischer, S [1 ]
Detter, C [1 ]
Peter, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Anesthesiol, D-81366 Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200310000-00013
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Sevoflurane, like other halogenated anesthetics, has been shown to have a protective effect on the myocardium at risk after an ischemic injury. The current study tested the hypothesis that such beneficial effects, so far mainly seen in the laboratory, are reproducible in humans. Methods. After institutional review board approval, 20 patients scheduled to undergo elective off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized to receive general anesthesia with either sevoflurane or propofol. Except for this, anesthetic and surgical management was the same in both groups. For assessing myocardial injury, troponin I and myocardial fraction of creatine kinase were determined during the first 24 postoperative hours. Systemic hemodynamic variables were measured before, during, and after completion of coronary artery bypass. Results: Troponin I concentrations increased significantly more in propofol-anesthetized patients than in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Conclusion: Patients receiving sevoflurane for off-pump coronary artery surgery had less myocardial injury during the first 24 postoperative hours than patients receiving propofol. The results further support cardioprotective effects of sevoflurane.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 833
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Myocardial infarction redefined -: A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction
    Alpert, JS
    Antman, E
    Apple, F
    Armstrong, PW
    Bassand, JP
    de Luna, AB
    Beller, G
    Breithardt, G
    Chaitman, BR
    Clemmensen, P
    Falk, E
    Fishbein, MC
    Galvani, M
    Garson, A
    Grines, C
    Hamm, C
    Hoppe, U
    Jaffe, A
    Katus, H
    Kjekshus, J
    Klein, W
    Klootwijk, P
    Lenfant, C
    Levy, D
    Levy, RI
    Luepker, R
    Marcus, F
    Näslund, U
    Ohman, M
    Pahlm, O
    Poole-Wilson, P
    Popp, R
    Pyörälä, K
    Ravkilde, J
    Rehnquist, N
    Roberts, W
    Roberts, R
    Roelandt, J
    Rydén, L
    Sans, S
    Simoons, ML
    Thygesen, K
    Tunstall-Pedoe, H
    Underwood, R
    Uretsky, BF
    de Werf, FV
    Voipio-Pulkki, LM
    Wagner, G
    Wallentin, L
    Wijns, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (18) : 1502 - 1513
  • [2] Belhomme D, 1999, CIRCULATION, V100, P340
  • [3] BULJUBASIC N, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P54
  • [4] Carden DL, 2000, J PATHOL, V190, P255, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200002)190:3<255::AID-PATH526>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-6
  • [6] Volatile anesthetics protect the ischemic rabbit myocardium from infarction
    Cope, DK
    Impastato, WK
    Cohen, MV
    Downey, JM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (03) : 699 - 709
  • [7] Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations
    Cremer, J
    Martin, M
    Redl, H
    Bahrami, S
    Abraham, C
    Graeter, T
    Haverich, A
    Schlag, G
    Borst, HG
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 61 (06) : 1714 - 1720
  • [8] THE EFFECT OF HALOTHANE ANESTHESIA ON MYOCARDIAL NECROSIS, HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE, AND REGIONAL MYOCARDIAL BLOOD-FLOW IN DOGS FOLLOWING CORONARY-ARTERY OCCLUSION
    DAVIS, RF
    DEBOER, LWV
    RUDE, RE
    LOWENSTEIN, E
    MAROKO, PR
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1983, 59 (05) : 402 - 411
  • [9] Sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function in coronary surgery patients
    De Hert, SG
    ten Broecke, PW
    Mertens, E
    Van Sommeren, EW
    De Blier, IG
    Stockman, BA
    Rodrigus, IE
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [10] Isoflurane pretreatment inhibits cytokine-induced cell death in cultured rat smooth muscle cells and human endothelial cells
    de Klaver, MJM
    Manning, L
    Palmer, LA
    Rich, GF
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (01) : 24 - 32