Multiple authorship - The contribution of senior authors

被引:147
作者
Drenth, JPH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen St Radboud Hosp, Dept Med, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1998年 / 280卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.280.3.219
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context.-The number of authors per article has increased markedly in recent years. Little is known about the hierarchical order of authorship and its change over time. Objective.-To assess the change in number and profile of authors of original articles published over a 20-year period in BMJ. It was hypothesized that the number of authors increased over this 20-year period and that it was the senior scientists who benefited most. Design.-Comparative descriptive analysis of the number and academic rank of authors who published original articles in BMJ volumes 270 (1975), 280 (1980), 290 (1985), 300 (1990), and 310 (1995). Main Outcome Measures.-The specific academic rank, order, and number of authors for each original article. Eight categories of authorship were distinguished as follows: 1, professor; 2, department chairperson; 3, consultant; 4, senior registrar; 5, lecturer and/or registrar; 6, medical student; 7, house officer; and 8, miscellaneous. Results.-The number of original articles published per year decreased from 262 (1975) to 125 (1995). The mean number (SD) of authors per article increased steadily from 3.21 (SD, 1.89) (1975) to 4.46 (SD, 2.04) (1995). Most authors belonged to category 3, and its proportion varied from 24.7% (1975) to 22.6% (1995), while category 1 grew from 13.2% to 20.3%. Category 5 authorship dropped from 24.3% (1975) to 15.8% (1995). With regard to first authorship, category 1 more than doubled from 8.0% (1975) to 16.8% (1995) compared with category 5 whose proportion decreased from 34.0% to 24.8%. Most last authors were from category 1, 20.4% (1975), growing to 29.0% (1995). Conclusion.-Over the last 20 years the number of BMJ authors of original articles increased, mainly because of the rise of authorship among professors and department chairpersons.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 221
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Currie C, 1997, BRIT MED J, V315, P747
[2]  
Drenth Joost P H, 1996, Sci Eng Ethics, V2, P469, DOI 10.1007/BF02583933
[3]  
Ezsias A, 1997, BRIT MED J, V315, P746
[4]   CRITERIA FOR AUTHORSHIP - STATISTICIANS SHOULD BE COAUTHORS [J].
MULLEE, MA ;
PICKERING, RM ;
LAMPE, FC ;
JULIOUS, SA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6983) :869-869
[5]   STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY [J].
MURRAY, GD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (07) :777-781
[6]  
MUSSUKARIS S, 1990, NEW ENGL J MED, V323, P488
[7]   MULTIPLE AUTHOR TREND WORST IN MEDICINE [J].
ONWUDE, JL ;
STAINES, A ;
LILFORD, RJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6888) :1345-1345
[8]   When authorship fails - A proposal to make contributors accountable [J].
Rennie, D ;
Yank, V ;
Emanuel, L .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (07) :579-585
[9]   THE ORDER OF AUTHORSHIP - WHOS ON 1ST [J].
RIESENBERG, D ;
LUNDBERG, GD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 264 (14) :1857-1857
[10]   THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS TO MULTIAUTHORED BIOMEDICAL-RESEARCH PAPERS [J].
SHAPIRO, DW ;
WENGER, NS ;
SHAPIRO, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (06) :438-442