American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management - American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force

被引:484
作者
Gordon, DB
Dahl, JL
Miaskowski, C
McCarberg, B
Todd, KH
Paice, JA
Lipman, AG
Bookbinder, M
Sanders, SH
Turk, DC
Carr, DB
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Hosp & Clin, Dept Nursing, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Physiol Nursing, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Pain & Emergency Med Inst, New York, NY USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Pharmacotherapy, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Dept Anesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[8] Univ Utah, Dept Pain Management, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[9] Siskin Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Chattanooga, TN USA
[10] Univ Washington, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA USA
[11] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.165.14.1574
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The American Pain Society (APS) set out to revise and expand its 1995 Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain and to facilitate improvements in the quality of pain management in all care settings. Methods: Eleven multidisciplinary members of the APS with expertise in quality improvement or measurement participated in the update. Five experts from organizations that focus on health care quality reviewed the final recommendations. MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched (1994-2004) to identify articles on pain quality measurement and quality improvement published after the development of the 1995 guidelines. The APS task force revised and expanded recommendations on the basis of the systematic review of published studies. The more than 3000 members of the APS were invited to provide input, and the 5 experts provided additional comments. The task force synthesized reviewers' comments into the final set of recommendations. Results: The recommendations specify that all care settings formulate structured, multilevel systems approaches (sensitive to the type of pain, population served, and setting of care) that ensure prompt recognition and treatment of pain, involvement of patients and families in the pain management plan, improved treatment patterns, regular reassessment and adjustment of the pain management plan as needed, and measurement of processes and outcomes of pain management. Conclusion: Efforts to improve the quality of pain management must move beyond assessment and communication of pain to implementation and evaluation of improvements in pain treatment that are timely, safe, evidence based, and multimodal.
引用
收藏
页码:1574 / 1580
页数:7
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC POL RE, CLIN PRACT GUID
[2]  
Allard P, 2001, J Palliat Med, V4, P191, DOI 10.1089/109662101750290227
[3]  
American Pain Society, 2003, PRINC AN US TREATM A
[4]  
Anderson KC, 2000, CANCER, V88, P1929, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000415)88:8<1929::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-2
[6]   Self-regulation training for chronic pain: Can it be done effectively by telemedicine? [J].
Appel, PR ;
Bleiberg, J ;
Noiseux, J .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2002, 8 (04) :361-368
[7]  
ARBOUR R, 2003, J CONTIN EDUC NURS, V34, P90
[8]  
Arbour Richard, 2003, J Contin Educ Nurs, V34, P64
[9]   Improving pain relief in a rural cancer center [J].
Baltic, TE ;
Whedon, MB ;
Ahles, TA ;
Fanciullo, G .
CANCER PRACTICE, 2002, 10 :S39-S44
[10]   Outcomes in acute pain trials: systematic review of what was reported? [J].
Barden, J ;
Edwards, JE ;
Mason, L ;
McQuay, HJ ;
Moore, RA .
PAIN, 2004, 109 (03) :351-356